Case selection for a Medicaid chronic care management program
| dc.contributor.author | Weir, Sharada | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aweh, Gideon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Clark, Robin E. | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:07.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:18:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:18:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008-12-02 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-03-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Health Care Financ Rev. 2008 Fall;30(1):61-74. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0195-8631 (Linking) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34730 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Medicaid agencies are beginning to turn to care management to reduce costs and improve health care quality. One challenge is selecting members at risk of costly, preventable service utilization. Using claims data from the State of Vermont, we compare the ability of three pre-existing health risk predictive models to predict the top 10 percent of members with chronic conditions: Chronic Illness and Disability Payment System (CDPS), Diagnostic Cost Groups (DCG), and Adjusted Clinical Groups Predictive Model (ACG-PM). We find that the ACG-PM model performs best. However, for predicting the very highest-cost members (e.g, the 99th percentile), the DCG model is preferred. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19040174&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
| dc.relation.url | http://www.cms.hhs.gov/HealthCareFinancingReview/downloads/08Fallpg61.pdf | |
| dc.subject | Chronic Disease | |
| dc.subject | Cost Control | |
| dc.subject | *Disease Management | |
| dc.subject | Forecasting | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | *Medicaid | |
| dc.subject | Models, Theoretical | |
| dc.subject | Quality of Health Care | |
| dc.subject | United States | |
| dc.subject | Vermont | |
| dc.subject | Vulnerable Populations | |
| dc.subject | Health Services Administration | |
| dc.subject | Health Services Research | |
| dc.subject | Public Health | |
| dc.title | Case selection for a Medicaid chronic care management program | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Health care financing review | |
| dc.source.volume | 30 | |
| dc.source.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/healthpolicy_pp/43 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 1201624 | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>Medicaid agencies are beginning to turn to care management to reduce costs and improve health care quality. One challenge is selecting members at risk of costly, preventable service utilization. Using claims data from the State of Vermont, we compare the ability of three pre-existing health risk predictive models to predict the top 10 percent of members with chronic conditions: Chronic Illness and Disability Payment System (CDPS), Diagnostic Cost Groups (DCG), and Adjusted Clinical Groups Predictive Model (ACG-PM). We find that the ACG-PM model performs best. However, for predicting the very highest-cost members (e.g, the 99th percentile), the DCG model is preferred.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | healthpolicy_pp/43 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Clinical and Population Health Research | |
| dc.contributor.department | Center for Health Policy and Research | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Family Medicine and Community Health | |
| dc.source.pages | 61-74 |