Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClark, Robin E.
dc.contributor.authorWeir, Sharada
dc.contributor.authorOuellette, Rebecca A.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jianying
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, Jeffrey D.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:07.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:18:06Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:18:06Z
dc.date.issued2009-03-26
dc.date.submitted2010-03-05
dc.identifier.citationMed Care. 2009 May;47(5):545-52. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318190db45">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0025-7079 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MLR.0b013e318190db45
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34734
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Most health insurance plans monitor ambulatory care quality using the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), publicly reporting results at the plan level. Plan-level comparisons obscure the influence of patients served or settings where care is delivered. Mental illness, substance abuse, and other physical comorbidities, particularly prevalent among Medicaid beneficiaries, can impact adherence to recommended care. We analyzed individual-level HEDIS measures for diabetes and asthma from 5 Medicaid managed care plans to understand how these factors contribute to quality. METHODS: We used claims and medical records to study HEDIS measures for persistent asthma (n = 9103) and diabetes (n = 1790) among beneficiaries enrolled in Massachusetts' Medicaid program during 2004 and 2005. Logistic regression models included patient-level demographic and health factors, provider type, region, and managed care plan. RESULTS: Alcohol and drug use disorders and emergency department use were associated with lower quality care for most measures. Glycemic control was better for patients with diabetes and severe mental illness. Patients with higher illness burden and with more frequent ambulatory visits received higher quality care for both conditions. Younger adults received recommended care less often than older adults. Quality varied across plans. CONCLUSIONS: Additional efforts to improve quality of care for asthma and diabetes for Medicaid beneficiaries are needed for individuals with substance use disorders and young adults. Although evidence of higher quality for patients with multiple conditions is encouraging, improving quality for comparatively healthier individuals might also produce significant long-term benefits.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19319000&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318190db45
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAsthma
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectChild, Preschool
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLogistic Models
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectManaged Care Programs
dc.subjectMassachusetts
dc.subjectMedicaid
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Quality of Health Care
dc.subject*Substance-Related Disorders
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.titleBeyond health plans: behavioral health disorders and quality of diabetes and asthma care for Medicaid beneficiaries
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleMedical care
dc.source.volume47
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/healthpolicy_pp/47
dc.identifier.contextkey1201628
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Most health insurance plans monitor ambulatory care quality using the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), publicly reporting results at the plan level. Plan-level comparisons obscure the influence of patients served or settings where care is delivered. Mental illness, substance abuse, and other physical comorbidities, particularly prevalent among Medicaid beneficiaries, can impact adherence to recommended care. We analyzed individual-level HEDIS measures for diabetes and asthma from 5 Medicaid managed care plans to understand how these factors contribute to quality.</p> <p>METHODS: We used claims and medical records to study HEDIS measures for persistent asthma (n = 9103) and diabetes (n = 1790) among beneficiaries enrolled in Massachusetts' Medicaid program during 2004 and 2005. Logistic regression models included patient-level demographic and health factors, provider type, region, and managed care plan.</p> <p>RESULTS: Alcohol and drug use disorders and emergency department use were associated with lower quality care for most measures. Glycemic control was better for patients with diabetes and severe mental illness. Patients with higher illness burden and with more frequent ambulatory visits received higher quality care for both conditions. Younger adults received recommended care less often than older adults. Quality varied across plans.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Additional efforts to improve quality of care for asthma and diabetes for Medicaid beneficiaries are needed for individuals with substance use disorders and young adults. Although evidence of higher quality for patients with multiple conditions is encouraging, improving quality for comparatively healthier individuals might also produce significant long-term benefits.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathhealthpolicy_pp/47
dc.contributor.departmentClinical and Population Health Research
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Health Policy and Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages545-52


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record