Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDube, William V.
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Krista M.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:07.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:18:27Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:18:27Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-01
dc.date.submitted2015-03-30
dc.identifier.citationDube WV, Wilkinson KM. The potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augment Altern Commun. 2014 Jun;30(2):172-85. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.904924. Epub 2014 Apr 29. PubMed PMID: 24773053; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4047139. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.904924">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0743-4618 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/07434618.2014.904924
dc.identifier.pmid24773053
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34818
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the phenomenon of stimulus overselectivity, or overselective attention, as it may impact AAC training and use in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Stimulus overselectivity is defined as an atypical limitation in the number of stimuli or stimulus features within an image that are attended to and subsequently learned. Within AAC, the term stimulus could refer to symbols or line drawings on speech-generating devices, drawings or pictures on low-technology systems, and/or the elements within visual scene displays. In this context, overselective attention may result in unusual or uneven error patterns such as confusion between two symbols that share a single feature, or difficulties with transitioning between different types of hardware. We review some of the ways that overselective attention has been studied behaviorally. We then examine how eye tracking technology allows a glimpse into some of the behavioral characteristics of overselective attention. We describe an intervention approach, differential observing responses, that may reduce or eliminate overselectivity, and we consider this type of intervention as it relates to issues of relevance for AAC.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=24773053&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.904924
dc.subjectBehavior and Behavior Mechanisms
dc.subjectCommunication Sciences and Disorders
dc.subjectExperimental Analysis of Behavior
dc.subjectMental Disorders
dc.titleThe potential influence of stimulus overselectivity in AAC: information from eye tracking and behavioral studies of attention with individuals with intellectual disabilities
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAugmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)
dc.source.volume30
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/iddrc_pubs/4
dc.identifier.contextkey6919865
html.description.abstract<p>This paper examines the phenomenon of stimulus overselectivity, or overselective attention, as it may impact AAC training and use in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Stimulus overselectivity is defined as an atypical limitation in the number of stimuli or stimulus features within an image that are attended to and subsequently learned. Within AAC, the term stimulus could refer to symbols or line drawings on speech-generating devices, drawings or pictures on low-technology systems, and/or the elements within visual scene displays. In this context, overselective attention may result in unusual or uneven error patterns such as confusion between two symbols that share a single feature, or difficulties with transitioning between different types of hardware. We review some of the ways that overselective attention has been studied behaviorally. We then examine how eye tracking technology allows a glimpse into some of the behavioral characteristics of overselective attention. We describe an intervention approach, differential observing responses, that may reduce or eliminate overselectivity, and we consider this type of intervention as it relates to issues of relevance for AAC.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathiddrc_pubs/4
dc.contributor.departmentShriver Center
dc.contributor.departmentIntellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center
dc.source.pages172-85


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record