Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRethlefsen, Melissa L.
dc.contributor.authorPiorun, Mary E
dc.contributor.authorPrince, Dale
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:16.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:24:15Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:24:15Z
dc.date.issued2009-10-01
dc.date.submitted2009-10-23
dc.identifier.citationJ Med Libr Assoc. 2009 October; 97(4): 253–259. Copyright © 2009, Authors. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.97.4.008">Link to article on publisher's website</a>
dc.identifier.doi10.3163/1536-5050.97.4.008
dc.identifier.pmid19851488
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36082
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The research evaluated participant satisfaction with the content and format of the ‘‘Web 2.0 101: Introduction to Second Generation Web Tools’’ course and measured the impact of the course on participants’ self-evaluated knowledge of Web 2.0 tools. Methods: The ‘‘Web 2.0 101’’ online course was based loosely on the Learning 2.0 model. Content was provided through a course blog and covered a wide range of Web 2.0 tools. All Medical Library Association members were invited to participate. Participants were asked to complete a post-course survey. Respondents who completed the entire course or who completed part of the course self-evaluated their knowledge of nine social software tools and concepts prior to and after the course using a Likert scale. Additional qualitative information about course strengths and weaknesses was also gathered. Results: Respondents’ self-ratings showed a significant change in perceived knowledge for each tool, using a matched pair Wilcoxon signed rank analysis (P,0.0001 for each tool/concept). Overall satisfaction with the course appeared high. Hands-on exercises were the most frequently identified strength of the course; the length and time-consuming nature of the course were considered weaknesses by some. Conclusion: Learning 2.0-style courses, though demanding time and self-motivation from participants, can increase knowledge of Web 2.0 tools.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=19851488&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.rightsCopyright © 2009, Authors.
dc.subjectInternet; Blogging; Libraries, Medical; Librarians; Education, Distance; Educational Technology; Teaching
dc.subjectLibrary and Information Science
dc.titleTeaching Web 2.0 Technologies Using Web 2.0 Technologies
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&amp;context=lib_articles&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lib_articles/104
dc.identifier.contextkey1044365
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:24:15Z
atmire.contributor.authoremailmary.piorun@umassmed.edu
html.description.abstract<p>Objectives: The research evaluated participant satisfaction with the content and format of the ‘‘Web 2.0 101: Introduction to Second Generation Web Tools’’ course and measured the impact of the course on participants’ self-evaluated knowledge of Web 2.0 tools.</p> <p>Methods: The ‘‘Web 2.0 101’’ online course was based loosely on the Learning 2.0 model. Content was provided through a course blog and covered a wide range of Web 2.0 tools. All Medical Library Association members were invited to participate. Participants were asked to complete a post-course survey. Respondents who completed the entire course or who completed part of the course self-evaluated their knowledge of nine social software tools and concepts prior to and after the course using a Likert scale. Additional qualitative information about course strengths and weaknesses was also gathered.</p> <p>Results: Respondents’ self-ratings showed a significant change in perceived knowledge for each tool, using a matched pair Wilcoxon signed rank analysis (P,0.0001 for each tool/concept). Overall satisfaction with the course appeared high. Hands-on exercises were the most frequently identified strength of the course; the length and time-consuming nature of the course were considered weaknesses by some.</p> <p>Conclusion: Learning 2.0-style courses, though demanding time and self-motivation from participants, can increase knowledge of Web 2.0 tools.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathlib_articles/104


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
mlab_97_04_253.pdf
Size:
192.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record