Teaching Web 2.0 Technologies Using Web 2.0 Technologies
dc.contributor.author | Rethlefsen, Melissa L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Piorun, Mary E | |
dc.contributor.author | Prince, Dale | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:16.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:24:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:24:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-10-01 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-10-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 October; 97(4): 253–259. Copyright © 2009, Authors. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.97.4.008">Link to article on publisher's website</a> | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3163/1536-5050.97.4.008 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19851488 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36082 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The research evaluated participant satisfaction with the content and format of the ‘‘Web 2.0 101: Introduction to Second Generation Web Tools’’ course and measured the impact of the course on participants’ self-evaluated knowledge of Web 2.0 tools. Methods: The ‘‘Web 2.0 101’’ online course was based loosely on the Learning 2.0 model. Content was provided through a course blog and covered a wide range of Web 2.0 tools. All Medical Library Association members were invited to participate. Participants were asked to complete a post-course survey. Respondents who completed the entire course or who completed part of the course self-evaluated their knowledge of nine social software tools and concepts prior to and after the course using a Likert scale. Additional qualitative information about course strengths and weaknesses was also gathered. Results: Respondents’ self-ratings showed a significant change in perceived knowledge for each tool, using a matched pair Wilcoxon signed rank analysis (P,0.0001 for each tool/concept). Overall satisfaction with the course appeared high. Hands-on exercises were the most frequently identified strength of the course; the length and time-consuming nature of the course were considered weaknesses by some. Conclusion: Learning 2.0-style courses, though demanding time and self-motivation from participants, can increase knowledge of Web 2.0 tools. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=19851488&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a> | |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2009, Authors. | |
dc.subject | Internet; Blogging; Libraries, Medical; Librarians; Education, Distance; Educational Technology; Teaching | |
dc.subject | Library and Information Science | |
dc.title | Teaching Web 2.0 Technologies Using Web 2.0 Technologies | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=lib_articles&unstamped=1 | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lib_articles/104 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1044365 | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-08-23T16:24:15Z | |
atmire.contributor.authoremail | mary.piorun@umassmed.edu | |
html.description.abstract | <p>Objectives: The research evaluated participant satisfaction with the content and format of the ‘‘Web 2.0 101: Introduction to Second Generation Web Tools’’ course and measured the impact of the course on participants’ self-evaluated knowledge of Web 2.0 tools.</p> <p>Methods: The ‘‘Web 2.0 101’’ online course was based loosely on the Learning 2.0 model. Content was provided through a course blog and covered a wide range of Web 2.0 tools. All Medical Library Association members were invited to participate. Participants were asked to complete a post-course survey. Respondents who completed the entire course or who completed part of the course self-evaluated their knowledge of nine social software tools and concepts prior to and after the course using a Likert scale. Additional qualitative information about course strengths and weaknesses was also gathered.</p> <p>Results: Respondents’ self-ratings showed a significant change in perceived knowledge for each tool, using a matched pair Wilcoxon signed rank analysis (P,0.0001 for each tool/concept). Overall satisfaction with the course appeared high. Hands-on exercises were the most frequently identified strength of the course; the length and time-consuming nature of the course were considered weaknesses by some.</p> <p>Conclusion: Learning 2.0-style courses, though demanding time and self-motivation from participants, can increase knowledge of Web 2.0 tools.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | lib_articles/104 |