Envisioning the Library’s Role in Scholarly Communication in the Year 2025
| dc.contributor.author | Carpenter, Maria | |
| dc.contributor.author | Graybill, Jolie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Offord, Jerome Jr. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Piorun, Mary E | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:16.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:24:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:24:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-04-01 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-04-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | portal: Libraries and the Academy, Volume 11, Issue 2, April, 2011, pages 659-681. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1353/pla.2011.0014 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36102 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This research probes future roles for libraries in the scholarly communication process through the use of scenarios. The researchers asked 20 ARL library directors to read and provide constructive comments on the scenarios, name the scenarios, and either select a scenario that most closely matched their vision or propose a new scenario. The directors identified six possible futures. Issues such as library as publisher, the economy, and the need for collaboration are discussed, as well as the timeframe for such futures and the desire versus the likelihood of a particular scenario happening. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Johns Hopkins University Press | |
| dc.rights | This article first appeared in PORTAL: LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY, Volume 11, Issue 2, April, 2011, pages 659-681. Copyright © 2011 The Johns Hopkins University Press. | |
| dc.subject | Libraries; Library Administration; Library Services; Forecasting; Role; Publishing | |
| dc.subject | Library and Information Science | |
| dc.title | Envisioning the Library’s Role in Scholarly Communication in the Year 2025 | |
| dc.type | Accepted Manuscript | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | portal: Libraries and the Academy | |
| dc.source.volume | 11 | |
| dc.source.issue | 2 | |
| dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1127&context=lib_articles&unstamped=1 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lib_articles/122 | |
| dc.legacy.embargo | 2011-04-20T00:00:00-07:00 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 1949571 | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2022-08-23T16:24:21Z | |
| atmire.contributor.authoremail | mary.piorun@umassmed.edu | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>This research probes future roles for libraries in the scholarly communication process through the use of scenarios. The researchers asked 20 ARL library directors to read and provide constructive comments on the scenarios, name the scenarios, and either select a scenario that most closely matched their vision or propose a new scenario. The directors identified six possible futures. Issues such as library as publisher, the economy, and the need for collaboration are discussed, as well as the timeframe for such futures and the desire versus the likelihood of a particular scenario happening.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | lib_articles/122 | |
| dc.source.pages | 659-681 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Challenges and Lessons Learned: Moving From Image Database to Institutional RepositoryPurpose– The purpose of this paper is to chronicle the Lamar Soutter Library's effort to build an educational image database, and how the project developed into an institutional repository. Design/methodology/approach– The paper is divided into three phases and highlights the organizational, political, technological and resource issues that are unique to a specialized library with a medium-sized staff, lacking the resources of a traditional university campus. The case concludes with a list of barriers and facilitators to success and a summary of lessons learned. Findings– The paper finds that a library with limited staff, funding, and systems development resources can initiate and support an institutional repository. Facilitators of success include clear lines of authority, a strong champion, and the appropriate technology for the project. Originality/value – This paper serves as an example to libraries that are in the beginning phases of developing an institutional repository by discussing the barriers to and facilitators of success.
-
Expanding the OPACPurpose:This poster will describe the process of incorporating the manual card catalogs of seven affiliate hospital libraries into one integrated library system (Voyager by Endeavor). The goal being to provide greater access to library resources for students, residents and physicians at affiliate hospitals by incorporating the book and journal holdings of the health care libraries into one centralized location using Endeavor’s Integrated Library System. Setting/Participants/Resources:The UMass Memorial Health Care system has thirteen affiliate hospitals. Each hospital was invited to participate in this program which offered a computer workstation, software and training, and support. Seven of the hospitals elected to participate. Poster information will include: Overview and evaluation of the project goals and objectives. A presentation describing the planning and implementation of project. A summary of the training methods used to educate representatives from the seven affiliate hospitals. Sample screen shots of the newly expanded OPAC. Statistics reporting the number of records entered to date and usage statistics. Outcomes/Evaluation:All seven participating libraries have successfully setup the computer workstations, attended training, and started adding holding records to the OPAC. Data and comments from the participating libraries will be used to judge the effectiveness of this program and determine if other modules will be offered to the participating libraries, such as serial check in and circulation. Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, May 20, 2001.
-
Anatomy of an Institutional Repository: Dissecting the Metadata ProcessIn 2006 the Lamar Soutter Library at the University of Massachusetts Medical School licensed ProQuest’s Digital Commons institutional repository (IR) software and launched eScholarship@UMMS. The goals were to provide a showcase for the medical school’s research, teaching, and scholarship; promote open access to research; and make available an easy way for faculty and researchers to promote and distribute their work. To date the Library has established five distinct collections. Each collection varies in scope and in the way the Library acquires the content. This variation poses many challenges for metadata creation and maintenance. Each collection entails the establishment of record templates, metadata requirements, workflow processes, and quality control procedures. Ongoing work includes assigning medical subject headings and reviewing metadata submitted with the item. With the IR, the work of Library catalogers is more visible than ever before, especially since the metadata is searched in Google. This poster will address these content management challenges and successes from the perspective of a medium-sized academic health sciences library just getting started with digitization. The poster will include displays of records from both the administrative and end-user interfaces, metadata requirements, and usage data. Presented at the American Library Association Annual Conference, Washington, DC, on June 25, 2007.
