Mitosis and the Life Cycle: A Metaphor for the Transformation of the Research Librarian
| dc.contributor.author | Gore, Sally A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Palmer, Lisa A. | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:16.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:24:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:24:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-05-15 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-05-25 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.13028/qqjy-0c69 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36109 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This poster describes how established and traditional library tools and services at an academic health sciences library served as the “nucleus” for new services and collaborations with university researchers. Setting: Research and Scholarly Communication Services Department, Lamar Soutter Library, University of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS) Description: The Department is charged with overseeing four major areas: Scholarly Communications Library Services to the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (GSBS), as well as the larger research community eScholarship@UMMS, the University’s institutional repository eScience Initiative of the Library Outcome: Leveraging existing relationships with GSBS faculty and administration, a popular institutional repository, and the NIH Public Access Policy, the department successfully integrated itself into the research community of the University, producing a number of expanded and new services. Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting, May 15, 2011, Minneapolis, MN. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.relation | <p><a href="http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/">eScholarship@UMMS Institutional Repository</a></p> | |
| dc.rights | Copyright the Author(s) | |
| dc.subject | Science; Biomedical Research; Libraries, Medical; Library Services; Lamar Soutter Library; Librarians; Digital Libraries | |
| dc.subject | Library and Information Science | |
| dc.title | Mitosis and the Life Cycle: A Metaphor for the Transformation of the Research Librarian | |
| dc.type | Poster | |
| dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1134&context=lib_articles&unstamped=1 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lib_articles/129 | |
| dc.legacy.embargo | 2011-05-25T00:00:00-07:00 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 2030108 | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2022-08-23T16:24:23Z | |
| atmire.contributor.authoremail | lisa.palmer@umassmed.edu | en_US |
| atmire.contributor.authoremail | sally.gore@umassmed.edu | en_US |
| html.description.abstract | <p><strong>Purpose:</strong> This poster describes how established and traditional library tools and services at an academic health sciences library served as the “nucleus” for new services and collaborations with university researchers.</p> <p><strong>Setting: </strong>Research and Scholarly Communication Services Department, Lamar Soutter Library, University of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS)</p> <p><strong>Description: </strong>The Department is charged with overseeing four major areas: <ul> <li>Scholarly Communications</li> <li>Library Services to the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (GSBS), as well as the larger research community</li> <li>eScholarship@UMMS, the University’s institutional repository</li> <li>eScience Initiative of the Library<strong></strong></li> </ul></p> <p><strong>Outcome:</strong> Leveraging existing relationships with GSBS faculty and administration, a popular institutional repository, and the NIH Public Access Policy, the department successfully integrated itself into the research community of the University, producing a number of expanded and new services.</p> <p>Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting, May 15, 2011, Minneapolis, MN.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | lib_articles/129 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Challenges and Lessons Learned: Moving From Image Database to Institutional RepositoryPurpose– The purpose of this paper is to chronicle the Lamar Soutter Library's effort to build an educational image database, and how the project developed into an institutional repository. Design/methodology/approach– The paper is divided into three phases and highlights the organizational, political, technological and resource issues that are unique to a specialized library with a medium-sized staff, lacking the resources of a traditional university campus. The case concludes with a list of barriers and facilitators to success and a summary of lessons learned. Findings– The paper finds that a library with limited staff, funding, and systems development resources can initiate and support an institutional repository. Facilitators of success include clear lines of authority, a strong champion, and the appropriate technology for the project. Originality/value – This paper serves as an example to libraries that are in the beginning phases of developing an institutional repository by discussing the barriers to and facilitators of success.
-
Expanding the OPACPurpose:This poster will describe the process of incorporating the manual card catalogs of seven affiliate hospital libraries into one integrated library system (Voyager by Endeavor). The goal being to provide greater access to library resources for students, residents and physicians at affiliate hospitals by incorporating the book and journal holdings of the health care libraries into one centralized location using Endeavor’s Integrated Library System. Setting/Participants/Resources:The UMass Memorial Health Care system has thirteen affiliate hospitals. Each hospital was invited to participate in this program which offered a computer workstation, software and training, and support. Seven of the hospitals elected to participate. Poster information will include: Overview and evaluation of the project goals and objectives. A presentation describing the planning and implementation of project. A summary of the training methods used to educate representatives from the seven affiliate hospitals. Sample screen shots of the newly expanded OPAC. Statistics reporting the number of records entered to date and usage statistics. Outcomes/Evaluation:All seven participating libraries have successfully setup the computer workstations, attended training, and started adding holding records to the OPAC. Data and comments from the participating libraries will be used to judge the effectiveness of this program and determine if other modules will be offered to the participating libraries, such as serial check in and circulation. Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, May 20, 2001.
-
Anatomy of an Institutional Repository: Dissecting the Metadata ProcessIn 2006 the Lamar Soutter Library at the University of Massachusetts Medical School licensed ProQuest’s Digital Commons institutional repository (IR) software and launched eScholarship@UMMS. The goals were to provide a showcase for the medical school’s research, teaching, and scholarship; promote open access to research; and make available an easy way for faculty and researchers to promote and distribute their work. To date the Library has established five distinct collections. Each collection varies in scope and in the way the Library acquires the content. This variation poses many challenges for metadata creation and maintenance. Each collection entails the establishment of record templates, metadata requirements, workflow processes, and quality control procedures. Ongoing work includes assigning medical subject headings and reviewing metadata submitted with the item. With the IR, the work of Library catalogers is more visible than ever before, especially since the metadata is searched in Google. This poster will address these content management challenges and successes from the perspective of a medium-sized academic health sciences library just getting started with digitization. The poster will include displays of records from both the administrative and end-user interfaces, metadata requirements, and usage data. Presented at the American Library Association Annual Conference, Washington, DC, on June 25, 2007.
