Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Lisa A.
dc.contributor.authorKipnis, Daniel G.
dc.contributor.authorLuther, Judy
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:17.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:24:46Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:24:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-11
dc.date.submitted2019-05-05
dc.identifier.doi10.13028/7hxz-b269
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36203
dc.description.abstractThis poster presents findings from two research studies about institutional repositories (IRs): one survey to members of the Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries, and the other an open survey with primary responses from academic libraries in North America. The poster compares and contrasts several findings, including: Are academic medical institutional repositories utilizing different software platforms than other academic IRs? Are academic medical IRs staffed differently than other academic IRs? In this complex scholarly communication environment, are IR managers considering plans to migrate to new platforms? This poster explores findings from the two surveys to help capture a current snapshot of the repository landscape. This will be a “poster conversation” where we will engage attendees about the repositories at their own institutions and give them an opportunity for meaningful discussion. Presented as an interactive iPosterSessions poster at the Association of College and Research (ACRL) 2019 Conference, Cleveland, OH, April 11, 2019.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="https://acrl2019-acrl.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=23-C8-88-A6-ED-F7-DC-CF-46-AB-EF-00-6F-2A-1B-A4" target="_blank" title="Link to interactive version of poster">Link to interactive iPosterSessions poster</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright 2019 Palmer, Kipnis, Luther
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectinstitutional repositories
dc.subjectIRs
dc.subjectmedical libraries
dc.subjectHealth Sciences and Medical Librarianship
dc.subjectScholarly Communication
dc.subjectScholarly Publishing
dc.titleComparing and Contrasting Medical Institutional Repositories with Other Academic IRs: Results of Two Research Studies
dc.typePoster
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1224&amp;context=lib_articles&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/lib_articles/215
dc.identifier.contextkey14433505
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:24:47Z
atmire.contributor.authoremaillisa.palmer@umassmed.eduen_US
html.description.abstract<p>This poster presents findings from two research studies about institutional repositories (IRs): one survey to members of the Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries, and the other an open survey with primary responses from academic libraries in North America. The poster compares and contrasts several findings, including: Are academic medical institutional repositories utilizing different software platforms than other academic IRs? Are academic medical IRs staffed differently than other academic IRs? In this complex scholarly communication environment, are IR managers considering plans to migrate to new platforms? This poster explores findings from the two surveys to help capture a current snapshot of the repository landscape. This will be a “poster conversation” where we will engage attendees about the repositories at their own institutions and give them an opportunity for meaningful discussion.</p> <p>Presented as an interactive iPosterSessions poster at the Association of College and Research (ACRL) 2019 Conference, Cleveland, OH, April 11, 2019.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathlib_articles/215
dc.contributor.departmentLamar Soutter Library


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
acrl__iPosterSessions___an_aMu ...
Size:
1.731Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright 2019 Palmer, Kipnis, Luther
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2019 Palmer, Kipnis, Luther