Gene expression profiling for molecular staging of cutaneous melanoma in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Gerami, PedramCook, Robert W.
Russell, Maria C.
Wilkinson, Jeff
Amaria, Rodabe N.
Gonzalez, Rene
Lyle, Stephen
Jackson, Gilchrist L.
Greisinger, Anthony J.
Johnson, Clare E.
Oelschlager, Kristen M.
Stone, John F.
Maetzold, Derek J.
Ferris, Laura K.
Wayne, Jeffrey D.
Cooper, Chelsea
Obregon, Roxana
Delman, Keith A.
Lawson, David
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer BiologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2015-05-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: A gene expression profile (GEP) test able to accurately identify risk of metastasis for patients with cutaneous melanoma has been clinically validated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed for assessment of the prognostic accuracy of GEP and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) tests, independently and in combination, in a multicenter cohort of 217 patients. METHODS: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to assess the expression of 31 genes from primary melanoma tumors, and SLNB outcome was determined from clinical data. Prognostic accuracy of each test was determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis of disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals. RESULTS: GEP outcome was a more significant and better predictor of each end point in univariate and multivariate regression analysis, compared with SLNB (P < .0001 for all). In combination with SLNB, GEP improved prognostication. For patients with a GEP high-risk outcome and a negative SLNB result, Kaplan-Meier 5-year disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals were 35%, 49%, and 54%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Within the SLNB-negative cohort of patients, overall risk of metastatic events was higher ( approximately 30%) than commonly found in the general population of patients with melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, GEP was an objective tool that accurately predicted metastatic risk in SLNB-eligible patients. Inc. All rights reserved.Source
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 May;72(5):780-785.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36517PubMed ID
25748297Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009