Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGerami, Pedram
dc.contributor.authorCook, Robert W.
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Maria C.
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Jeff
dc.contributor.authorAmaria, Rodabe N.
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Rene
dc.contributor.authorLyle, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Gilchrist L.
dc.contributor.authorGreisinger, Anthony J.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Clare E.
dc.contributor.authorOelschlager, Kristen M.
dc.contributor.authorStone, John F.
dc.contributor.authorMaetzold, Derek J.
dc.contributor.authorFerris, Laura K.
dc.contributor.authorWayne, Jeffrey D.
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Chelsea
dc.contributor.authorObregon, Roxana
dc.contributor.authorDelman, Keith A.
dc.contributor.authorLawson, David
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:18.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:26:13Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:26:13Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-01
dc.date.submitted2015-04-24
dc.identifier.citationJ Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 May;72(5):780-785.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Mar 3. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0190-9622 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009
dc.identifier.pmid25748297
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36517
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A gene expression profile (GEP) test able to accurately identify risk of metastasis for patients with cutaneous melanoma has been clinically validated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed for assessment of the prognostic accuracy of GEP and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) tests, independently and in combination, in a multicenter cohort of 217 patients. METHODS: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to assess the expression of 31 genes from primary melanoma tumors, and SLNB outcome was determined from clinical data. Prognostic accuracy of each test was determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis of disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals. RESULTS: GEP outcome was a more significant and better predictor of each end point in univariate and multivariate regression analysis, compared with SLNB (P < .0001 for all). In combination with SLNB, GEP improved prognostication. For patients with a GEP high-risk outcome and a negative SLNB result, Kaplan-Meier 5-year disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals were 35%, 49%, and 54%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Within the SLNB-negative cohort of patients, overall risk of metastatic events was higher ( approximately 30%) than commonly found in the general population of patients with melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, GEP was an objective tool that accurately predicted metastatic risk in SLNB-eligible patients. Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=25748297&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009
dc.subjectCancer Biology
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjectMolecular Genetics
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases
dc.titleGene expression profiling for molecular staging of cutaneous melanoma in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
dc.source.volume72
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/mccb_pubs/11
dc.identifier.contextkey7027656
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: A gene expression profile (GEP) test able to accurately identify risk of metastasis for patients with cutaneous melanoma has been clinically validated.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: We aimed for assessment of the prognostic accuracy of GEP and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) tests, independently and in combination, in a multicenter cohort of 217 patients.</p> <p>METHODS: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to assess the expression of 31 genes from primary melanoma tumors, and SLNB outcome was determined from clinical data. Prognostic accuracy of each test was determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis of disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals.</p> <p>RESULTS: GEP outcome was a more significant and better predictor of each end point in univariate and multivariate regression analysis, compared with SLNB (P < .0001 for all). In combination with SLNB, GEP improved prognostication. For patients with a GEP high-risk outcome and a negative SLNB result, Kaplan-Meier 5-year disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals were 35%, 49%, and 54%, respectively.</p> <p>LIMITATIONS: Within the SLNB-negative cohort of patients, overall risk of metastatic events was higher ( approximately 30%) than commonly found in the general population of patients with melanoma.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, GEP was an objective tool that accurately predicted metastatic risk in SLNB-eligible patients. Inc. All rights reserved.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmccb_pubs/11
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology
dc.source.pages780-785.e3


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record