Gene expression profiling for molecular staging of cutaneous melanoma in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy
dc.contributor.author | Gerami, Pedram | |
dc.contributor.author | Cook, Robert W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Russell, Maria C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilkinson, Jeff | |
dc.contributor.author | Amaria, Rodabe N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gonzalez, Rene | |
dc.contributor.author | Lyle, Stephen | |
dc.contributor.author | Jackson, Gilchrist L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Greisinger, Anthony J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Clare E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Oelschlager, Kristen M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stone, John F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Maetzold, Derek J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferris, Laura K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wayne, Jeffrey D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cooper, Chelsea | |
dc.contributor.author | Obregon, Roxana | |
dc.contributor.author | Delman, Keith A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lawson, David | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:18.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:26:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:26:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-05-01 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-04-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 May;72(5):780-785.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Mar 3. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009">Link to article on publisher's site</a> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0190-9622 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 25748297 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36517 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: A gene expression profile (GEP) test able to accurately identify risk of metastasis for patients with cutaneous melanoma has been clinically validated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed for assessment of the prognostic accuracy of GEP and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) tests, independently and in combination, in a multicenter cohort of 217 patients. METHODS: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to assess the expression of 31 genes from primary melanoma tumors, and SLNB outcome was determined from clinical data. Prognostic accuracy of each test was determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis of disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals. RESULTS: GEP outcome was a more significant and better predictor of each end point in univariate and multivariate regression analysis, compared with SLNB (P < .0001 for all). In combination with SLNB, GEP improved prognostication. For patients with a GEP high-risk outcome and a negative SLNB result, Kaplan-Meier 5-year disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals were 35%, 49%, and 54%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Within the SLNB-negative cohort of patients, overall risk of metastatic events was higher ( approximately 30%) than commonly found in the general population of patients with melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, GEP was an objective tool that accurately predicted metastatic risk in SLNB-eligible patients. Inc. All rights reserved. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=25748297&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.009 | |
dc.subject | Cancer Biology | |
dc.subject | Dermatology | |
dc.subject | Molecular Genetics | |
dc.subject | Neoplasms | |
dc.subject | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases | |
dc.title | Gene expression profiling for molecular staging of cutaneous melanoma in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology | |
dc.source.volume | 72 | |
dc.source.issue | 5 | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/mccb_pubs/11 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 7027656 | |
html.description.abstract | <p>BACKGROUND: A gene expression profile (GEP) test able to accurately identify risk of metastasis for patients with cutaneous melanoma has been clinically validated.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: We aimed for assessment of the prognostic accuracy of GEP and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) tests, independently and in combination, in a multicenter cohort of 217 patients.</p> <p>METHODS: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to assess the expression of 31 genes from primary melanoma tumors, and SLNB outcome was determined from clinical data. Prognostic accuracy of each test was determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis of disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals.</p> <p>RESULTS: GEP outcome was a more significant and better predictor of each end point in univariate and multivariate regression analysis, compared with SLNB (P < .0001 for all). In combination with SLNB, GEP improved prognostication. For patients with a GEP high-risk outcome and a negative SLNB result, Kaplan-Meier 5-year disease-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survivals were 35%, 49%, and 54%, respectively.</p> <p>LIMITATIONS: Within the SLNB-negative cohort of patients, overall risk of metastatic events was higher ( approximately 30%) than commonly found in the general population of patients with melanoma.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, GEP was an objective tool that accurately predicted metastatic risk in SLNB-eligible patients. Inc. All rights reserved.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | mccb_pubs/11 | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology | |
dc.source.pages | 780-785.e3 |