Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCol, Nananda F.
dc.contributor.authorGurwitz, Jerry H.
dc.contributor.authorAlpert, Joseph S.
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:27:30Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:27:30Z
dc.date.issued1994-01-15
dc.date.submitted2009-09-29
dc.identifier.citationAm J Cardiol. 1994 Jan 15;73(2):149-57.
dc.identifier.issn0002-9149
dc.identifier.pmid8296736
dc.identifier.pmid8296736
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36799
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which patients with cardiogenic shock have participated in trials of thrombolytic therapy, to examine factors associated with their exclusion from these trials, and to summarize data on the efficacy of thrombolysis in these patients. Previous publications were searched for all randomized, controlled studies involving the use of thrombolytic medications used in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Data were abstracted for year of trial publication, performance location, sample size, maximal allowable delay between symptom onset and treatment, and exclusion criteria. Of the 94 trials included in the analysis, 22% included patients with cardiogenic shock, 37% excluded them, and the remainder contained no information on their inclusion or exclusion. Only 2 trials provided data on the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock. Multivariate analysis revealed that studies conducted exclusively in the U.S. were significantly more likely to exclude patients in cardiogenic shock than those conducted outside of the U.S., as were studies that excluded patients with a previous myocardial infarction, studies published more recently, and smaller trials. Patients with cardiogenic shock have frequently been excluded from clinical trials of thrombolytic agents. As a result, data on the efficacy of thrombolytic agents in these patients is extremely limited.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherExcerpta Medica
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8296736&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(94)90206-2
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMultivariate Analysis
dc.subjectMyocardial Infarction
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectShock, Cardiogenic
dc.subjectThrombolytic Therapy
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleFrequency of inclusion of patients with cardiogenic shock in trials of thrombolytic therapy.
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe American journal of cardiology
dc.source.volume73
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/160
dc.identifier.contextkey1019652
html.description.abstract<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which patients with cardiogenic shock have participated in trials of thrombolytic therapy, to examine factors associated with their exclusion from these trials, and to summarize data on the efficacy of thrombolysis in these patients. Previous publications were searched for all randomized, controlled studies involving the use of thrombolytic medications used in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Data were abstracted for year of trial publication, performance location, sample size, maximal allowable delay between symptom onset and treatment, and exclusion criteria. Of the 94 trials included in the analysis, 22% included patients with cardiogenic shock, 37% excluded them, and the remainder contained no information on their inclusion or exclusion. Only 2 trials provided data on the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock. Multivariate analysis revealed that studies conducted exclusively in the U.S. were significantly more likely to exclude patients in cardiogenic shock than those conducted outside of the U.S., as were studies that excluded patients with a previous myocardial infarction, studies published more recently, and smaller trials. Patients with cardiogenic shock have frequently been excluded from clinical trials of thrombolytic agents. As a result, data on the efficacy of thrombolytic agents in these patients is extremely limited.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/160
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record