Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarrold, Leslie R.
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Susan E.
dc.contributor.authorEisner, Mark
dc.contributor.authorBuist, A. Sonia
dc.contributor.authorGo, Alan S.
dc.contributor.authorVollmer, William M.
dc.contributor.authorChan, K. Arnold
dc.contributor.authorFrazier, E. Ann
dc.contributor.authorWeller, Peter F.
dc.contributor.authorWechsler, Michael E.
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Kourtney J.
dc.contributor.authorPlatt, Richard
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:27:42Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:27:42Z
dc.date.issued2004-09-24
dc.date.submitted2010-04-30
dc.identifier.citationPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Oct;13(10):661-7. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.913">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1053-8569 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pds.913
dc.identifier.pmid15386588
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36846
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Our aim was to identify individuals with Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) among asthma drug users, based on patterns of diagnostic and procedural codes (termed 'algorithms') contained in automated claims data. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted among patients who had been dispensed asthma drugs at three HMOs. Individuals who received > or =3 dispensings of an asthma drug during any consecutive 12-month period beginning 1 January 1994 through 20 June 2000 were identified. Information on patient age, gender, enrollment status, asthma drugs dispensed, inpatient and outpatient diagnoses and procedures were obtained from the HMO automated databases. Twelve combinations of diagnostic and billing codes ('algorithms') were developed using the claims data to identify potential cases of CSS. Chart reviews blinded to drug exposure were performed using a standardized abstraction form. A rheumatologist reviewed abstracted information on all subjects, and those who met two or more American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for CSS were further reviewed by two clinical experts. Cases were classified as unlikely, possible, or probable/definite CSS. Each clinical expert independently rated the cases; disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: A total of 185 604 patients who had been dispensed asthma drugs were identified. Three hundred fifty subjects were selected for chart review, and 15 were classified as having 'probable/definite' CSS. The algorithms that were most successful in identifying patients with CSS were as follows: (1) two or more codes for vasculitis (13 confirmed cases from 129 reviewed; positive predictive value 10%); (2) codes for both vasculitis and neurologic symptoms (6 confirmed cases from 15 reviewed; positive predictive value 40%) and (3) codes for both eosinophilia and vasculitis (4 confirmed cases from 5 reviewed; positive predictive value 80%). CONCLUSION: Automated claims data can be used to identify patients with CSS. This approach can facilitate better epidemiologic study of the risk factors for the condition.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=15386588&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.913
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectChurg-Strauss Syndrome
dc.subjectDatabases as Topic
dc.subjectHealth Maintenance Organizations
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleIdentification of patients with Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) using automated data
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
dc.source.volume13
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/221
dc.identifier.contextkey1293955
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: Our aim was to identify individuals with Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) among asthma drug users, based on patterns of diagnostic and procedural codes (termed 'algorithms') contained in automated claims data.</p> <p>METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted among patients who had been dispensed asthma drugs at three HMOs. Individuals who received > or =3 dispensings of an asthma drug during any consecutive 12-month period beginning 1 January 1994 through 20 June 2000 were identified. Information on patient age, gender, enrollment status, asthma drugs dispensed, inpatient and outpatient diagnoses and procedures were obtained from the HMO automated databases. Twelve combinations of diagnostic and billing codes ('algorithms') were developed using the claims data to identify potential cases of CSS. Chart reviews blinded to drug exposure were performed using a standardized abstraction form. A rheumatologist reviewed abstracted information on all subjects, and those who met two or more American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for CSS were further reviewed by two clinical experts. Cases were classified as unlikely, possible, or probable/definite CSS. Each clinical expert independently rated the cases; disagreements were resolved by consensus.</p> <p>RESULTS: A total of 185 604 patients who had been dispensed asthma drugs were identified. Three hundred fifty subjects were selected for chart review, and 15 were classified as having 'probable/definite' CSS. The algorithms that were most successful in identifying patients with CSS were as follows: (1) two or more codes for vasculitis (13 confirmed cases from 129 reviewed; positive predictive value 10%); (2) codes for both vasculitis and neurologic symptoms (6 confirmed cases from 15 reviewed; positive predictive value 40%) and (3) codes for both eosinophilia and vasculitis (4 confirmed cases from 5 reviewed; positive predictive value 80%).</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Automated claims data can be used to identify patients with CSS. This approach can facilitate better epidemiologic study of the risk factors for the condition.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/221
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.source.pages661-7


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record