Frequency of serum creatinine monitoring during allopurinol therapy in ambulatory patients
Authors
Raebel, Marsha A.McClure, David L.
Simon, Steven R.
Chan, K. Arnold
Feldstein, Adrianne C.
Gunter, Margaret J.
Lafata, Jennifer Elston
Harrold, Leslie R.
Nelson, Winnie W.
Platt, Richard
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of RheumatologyMeyers Primary Care Institute
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2006-02-16Keywords
AdolescentAdult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Allopurinol
Chronic Disease
Cohort Studies
Creatinine
Databases, Factual
Female
Gout Suppressants
use
Health Maintenance Organizations
Humans
Insurance, Health
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic
Retrospective Studies
Health Services Research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Allopurinol dosage reduction is recommended in patients with renal dysfunction because drug toxicity risk is increased. Little information is available about serum creatinine (SCr) monitoring in ambulatory patients taking allopurinol. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate SCr monitoring among patients prescribed allopurinol, identify associated factors, and evaluate administrative data in assessing monitoring. METHODS: Information for this retrospective cohort study was drawn from a dataset of 2 020 037 individuals; approximately 200 000 members from each of 10 organizations. Study patients had received at least one year of ongoing allopurinol prescription dispensings. Patient variables analyzed included age, gender, chronic diseases, outpatient visits, hospitalizations, gout diagnosis, and SCr monitoring. A random sample of medical records was reviewed to assess the accuracy of the automated data. Statistical analysis included descriptive and logistic regression techniques. RESULTS: Overall, 1139 (26%) of 4357 patients did not have SCr monitoring. For individuals without recent hospitalization, factors protective against lack of monitoring were increasing age (OR 0.77 per 10 y; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.79), more chronic diseases (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.83), more outpatient visits (OR 0.87 per 5 visits; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.91), and gout diagnosis (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of administrative data compared with medical records for SCr monitoring were 92% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-fourth of patients dispensed allopurinol did not have SCr monitoring during one year of therapy. Lack of monitoring and lack of subsequent possible dosage adjustment put patients at increased risk of allopurinol toxicity.Source
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Mar;40(3):386-91. Epub 2006 Feb 14. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1345/aph.1G589Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36849PubMed ID
16478808Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1345/aph.1G589