Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaebel, Marsha A.
dc.contributor.authorMcClure, David L.
dc.contributor.authorSimon, Steven R.
dc.contributor.authorChan, K. Arnold
dc.contributor.authorFeldstein, Adrianne C.
dc.contributor.authorGunter, Margaret J.
dc.contributor.authorLafata, Jennifer Elston
dc.contributor.authorHarrold, Leslie R.
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Winnie W.
dc.contributor.authorPlatt, Richard
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:27:43Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:27:43Z
dc.date.issued2006-02-16
dc.date.submitted2010-04-30
dc.identifier.citationAnn Pharmacother. 2006 Mar;40(3):386-91. Epub 2006 Feb 14. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1345/aph.1G589">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1060-0280 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1345/aph.1G589
dc.identifier.pmid16478808
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36849
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Allopurinol dosage reduction is recommended in patients with renal dysfunction because drug toxicity risk is increased. Little information is available about serum creatinine (SCr) monitoring in ambulatory patients taking allopurinol. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate SCr monitoring among patients prescribed allopurinol, identify associated factors, and evaluate administrative data in assessing monitoring. METHODS: Information for this retrospective cohort study was drawn from a dataset of 2 020 037 individuals; approximately 200 000 members from each of 10 organizations. Study patients had received at least one year of ongoing allopurinol prescription dispensings. Patient variables analyzed included age, gender, chronic diseases, outpatient visits, hospitalizations, gout diagnosis, and SCr monitoring. A random sample of medical records was reviewed to assess the accuracy of the automated data. Statistical analysis included descriptive and logistic regression techniques. RESULTS: Overall, 1139 (26%) of 4357 patients did not have SCr monitoring. For individuals without recent hospitalization, factors protective against lack of monitoring were increasing age (OR 0.77 per 10 y; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.79), more chronic diseases (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.83), more outpatient visits (OR 0.87 per 5 visits; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.91), and gout diagnosis (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of administrative data compared with medical records for SCr monitoring were 92% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-fourth of patients dispensed allopurinol did not have SCr monitoring during one year of therapy. Lack of monitoring and lack of subsequent possible dosage adjustment put patients at increased risk of allopurinol toxicity.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16478808&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1345/aph.1G589
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAllopurinol
dc.subjectChronic Disease
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectCreatinine
dc.subjectDatabases, Factual
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGout Suppressants
dc.subjectuse
dc.subjectHealth Maintenance Organizations
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInsurance, Health
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMonitoring, Physiologic
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleFrequency of serum creatinine monitoring during allopurinol therapy in ambulatory patients
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe Annals of pharmacotherapy 16835310
dc.source.volume40
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/224
dc.identifier.contextkey1293958
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Allopurinol dosage reduction is recommended in patients with renal dysfunction because drug toxicity risk is increased. Little information is available about serum creatinine (SCr) monitoring in ambulatory patients taking allopurinol.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate SCr monitoring among patients prescribed allopurinol, identify associated factors, and evaluate administrative data in assessing monitoring.</p> <p>METHODS: Information for this retrospective cohort study was drawn from a dataset of 2 020 037 individuals; approximately 200 000 members from each of 10 organizations. Study patients had received at least one year of ongoing allopurinol prescription dispensings. Patient variables analyzed included age, gender, chronic diseases, outpatient visits, hospitalizations, gout diagnosis, and SCr monitoring. A random sample of medical records was reviewed to assess the accuracy of the automated data. Statistical analysis included descriptive and logistic regression techniques.</p> <p>RESULTS: Overall, 1139 (26%) of 4357 patients did not have SCr monitoring. For individuals without recent hospitalization, factors protective against lack of monitoring were increasing age (OR 0.77 per 10 y; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.79), more chronic diseases (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.83), more outpatient visits (OR 0.87 per 5 visits; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.91), and gout diagnosis (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of administrative data compared with medical records for SCr monitoring were 92% and 65%, respectively.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: More than one-fourth of patients dispensed allopurinol did not have SCr monitoring during one year of therapy. Lack of monitoring and lack of subsequent possible dosage adjustment put patients at increased risk of allopurinol toxicity.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/224
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.source.pages386-91


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record