Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCutrona, Sarah L.
dc.contributor.authorChoudhry, Niteesh K.
dc.contributor.authorStedman, Margaret R.
dc.contributor.authorServi, Amber
dc.contributor.authorLiberman, Joshua N.
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Troyen
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorBrookhart, M. Alan
dc.contributor.authorShrank, William H.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:27:46Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:27:46Z
dc.date.issued2010-10-14
dc.date.submitted2011-09-09
dc.identifier.citationJ Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1090-6. Epub 2010 May 13. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1387-9">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11606-010-1387-9
dc.identifier.pmid20464522
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36862
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Medications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease save lives but adherence is often inadequate. The optimal role for physicians in improving adherence remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Using existing evidence, we set the goal of evaluating the physician's role in improving medication adherence. DESIGN: We conducted systematic searches of English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through 12/31/2008. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We selected randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence to medications used for preventing or treating cardiovascular disease or diabetes. MAIN MEASURES: Articles were classified as either (1) physician "active"-a physician participated in designing or implementing the intervention; (2) physician "passive"-physicians treating intervention group patients received patient adherence information while physicians treating controls did not; or (3) physicians noninvolved. We also identified studies in which healthcare professionals helped deliver the intervention. We did a meta-analysis of the studies involving healthcare professionals to determine aggregate Cohen's D effect sizes (ES). KEY RESULTS: We identified 6,550 articles; 168 were reviewed in full, 82 met inclusion criteria. The majority of all studies (88.9%) showed improved adherence. Physician noninvolved studies were more likely (35.0% of studies) to show a medium or large effect on adherence compared to physician-involved studies (31.3%). Among interventions requiring a healthcare professional, physician-noninvolved interventions were more effective (ES 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.56) than physician-involved interventions (ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001). Among physician-involved interventions, physician-passive interventions were marginally more effective (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) than physician-active interventions (ES 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.28; p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence interventions utilizing non-physician healthcare professionals are effective in improving cardiovascular medication adherence, but further study is needed to identify the optimal role for physicians.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=20464522&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955481/pdf/11606_2010_Article_1387.pdf
dc.subjectCardiovascular Agents
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectHealth Personnel
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Medication Adherence
dc.subject*Physician's Role
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titlePhysician effectiveness in interventions to improve cardiovascular medication adherence: a systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of general internal medicine
dc.source.volume25
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/236
dc.identifier.contextkey2227700
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Medications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease save lives but adherence is often inadequate. The optimal role for physicians in improving adherence remains unclear.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: Using existing evidence, we set the goal of evaluating the physician's role in improving medication adherence.</p> <p>DESIGN: We conducted systematic searches of English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through 12/31/2008.</p> <p>SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We selected randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence to medications used for preventing or treating cardiovascular disease or diabetes.</p> <p>MAIN MEASURES: Articles were classified as either (1) physician "active"-a physician participated in designing or implementing the intervention; (2) physician "passive"-physicians treating intervention group patients received patient adherence information while physicians treating controls did not; or (3) physicians noninvolved. We also identified studies in which healthcare professionals helped deliver the intervention. We did a meta-analysis of the studies involving healthcare professionals to determine aggregate Cohen's D effect sizes (ES).</p> <p>KEY RESULTS: We identified 6,550 articles; 168 were reviewed in full, 82 met inclusion criteria. The majority of all studies (88.9%) showed improved adherence. Physician noninvolved studies were more likely (35.0% of studies) to show a medium or large effect on adherence compared to physician-involved studies (31.3%). Among interventions requiring a healthcare professional, physician-noninvolved interventions were more effective (ES 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.56) than physician-involved interventions (ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001). Among physician-involved interventions, physician-passive interventions were marginally more effective (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) than physician-active interventions (ES 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.28; p = 0.2).</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Adherence interventions utilizing non-physician healthcare professionals are effective in improving cardiovascular medication adherence, but further study is needed to identify the optimal role for physicians.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/236
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.source.pages1090-6


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record