Physician effectiveness in interventions to improve cardiovascular medication adherence: a systematic review
dc.contributor.author | Cutrona, Sarah L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Choudhry, Niteesh K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stedman, Margaret R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Servi, Amber | |
dc.contributor.author | Liberman, Joshua N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brennan, Troyen | |
dc.contributor.author | Fischer, Michael A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brookhart, M. Alan | |
dc.contributor.author | Shrank, William H. | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:21.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:27:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:27:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-10-14 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-09-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1090-6. Epub 2010 May 13. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1387-9">Link to article on publisher's site</a> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0884-8734 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11606-010-1387-9 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20464522 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36862 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Medications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease save lives but adherence is often inadequate. The optimal role for physicians in improving adherence remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Using existing evidence, we set the goal of evaluating the physician's role in improving medication adherence. DESIGN: We conducted systematic searches of English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through 12/31/2008. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We selected randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence to medications used for preventing or treating cardiovascular disease or diabetes. MAIN MEASURES: Articles were classified as either (1) physician "active"-a physician participated in designing or implementing the intervention; (2) physician "passive"-physicians treating intervention group patients received patient adherence information while physicians treating controls did not; or (3) physicians noninvolved. We also identified studies in which healthcare professionals helped deliver the intervention. We did a meta-analysis of the studies involving healthcare professionals to determine aggregate Cohen's D effect sizes (ES). KEY RESULTS: We identified 6,550 articles; 168 were reviewed in full, 82 met inclusion criteria. The majority of all studies (88.9%) showed improved adherence. Physician noninvolved studies were more likely (35.0% of studies) to show a medium or large effect on adherence compared to physician-involved studies (31.3%). Among interventions requiring a healthcare professional, physician-noninvolved interventions were more effective (ES 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.56) than physician-involved interventions (ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001). Among physician-involved interventions, physician-passive interventions were marginally more effective (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) than physician-active interventions (ES 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.28; p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence interventions utilizing non-physician healthcare professionals are effective in improving cardiovascular medication adherence, but further study is needed to identify the optimal role for physicians. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=20464522&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
dc.relation.url | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955481/pdf/11606_2010_Article_1387.pdf | |
dc.subject | Cardiovascular Agents | |
dc.subject | Cardiovascular Diseases | |
dc.subject | Health Personnel | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | *Medication Adherence | |
dc.subject | *Physician's Role | |
dc.subject | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | |
dc.subject | Cardiovascular Diseases | |
dc.subject | Health Services Research | |
dc.title | Physician effectiveness in interventions to improve cardiovascular medication adherence: a systematic review | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of general internal medicine | |
dc.source.volume | 25 | |
dc.source.issue | 10 | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/236 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 2227700 | |
html.description.abstract | <p>BACKGROUND: Medications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease save lives but adherence is often inadequate. The optimal role for physicians in improving adherence remains unclear.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: Using existing evidence, we set the goal of evaluating the physician's role in improving medication adherence.</p> <p>DESIGN: We conducted systematic searches of English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through 12/31/2008.</p> <p>SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We selected randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence to medications used for preventing or treating cardiovascular disease or diabetes.</p> <p>MAIN MEASURES: Articles were classified as either (1) physician "active"-a physician participated in designing or implementing the intervention; (2) physician "passive"-physicians treating intervention group patients received patient adherence information while physicians treating controls did not; or (3) physicians noninvolved. We also identified studies in which healthcare professionals helped deliver the intervention. We did a meta-analysis of the studies involving healthcare professionals to determine aggregate Cohen's D effect sizes (ES).</p> <p>KEY RESULTS: We identified 6,550 articles; 168 were reviewed in full, 82 met inclusion criteria. The majority of all studies (88.9%) showed improved adherence. Physician noninvolved studies were more likely (35.0% of studies) to show a medium or large effect on adherence compared to physician-involved studies (31.3%). Among interventions requiring a healthcare professional, physician-noninvolved interventions were more effective (ES 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.56) than physician-involved interventions (ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001). Among physician-involved interventions, physician-passive interventions were marginally more effective (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) than physician-active interventions (ES 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.28; p = 0.2).</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Adherence interventions utilizing non-physician healthcare professionals are effective in improving cardiovascular medication adherence, but further study is needed to identify the optimal role for physicians.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | meyers_pp/236 | |
dc.contributor.department | Meyers Primary Care Institute | |
dc.source.pages | 1090-6 |