• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingAccessibilityTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Comparison of blogged and written reflections in two medicine clerkships

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Fischer, Melissa A.
    Haley, Heather-Lyn
    Saarinen, Carrie L.
    Chretien, Katherine C C.
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Office of Educational Affairs
    Department of Family Medicine and Community Health
    Department of Medicine
    Meyers Primary Care Institute
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Publication Date
    2011-02-07
    Keywords
    *Blogging
    Clinical Clerkship
    Educational Technology
    Epidemiologic Methods
    Humans
    Internal Medicine
    Learning
    Students, Medical
    Teaching
    Technology Assessment, Biomedical
    Thinking
    *Writing
    Education
    Health Services Research
    Medicine and Health Sciences
    Primary Care
    Show allShow less
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03814.x
    Abstract
    CONTEXT: academic medical centres may adopt new learning technologies with little data on their effectiveness or on how they compare with traditional methodologies. We conducted a comparative study of student reflective writings produced using either an electronic (blog) format or a traditional written (essay) format to assess differences in content, depth of reflection and student preference. METHODS: students in internal medicine clerkships at two US medical schools during the 2008-2009 academic year were quasi-randomly assigned to one of two study arms according to which they were asked to either write a traditional reflective essay and subsequently join in faculty-moderated, small-group discussion (n = 45), or post two writings to a faculty-moderated group blog and provide at least one comment on a peer's posts (n = 50). Examples from a pilot block were used to refine coding methods and determine inter-rater reliability. Writings were coded for theme and level of reflection by two blinded authors; these coding processes reached inter-rater reliabilities of 91% and 80%, respectively. Anonymous pre- and post-clerkship surveys assessed student perceptions and preferences. RESULTS: student writing addressed seven main themes: (i) being humanistic; (ii) professional behaviour; (iii) understanding caregiving relationships; (iv) being a student; (v) clinical learning; (vi) dealing with death and dying, and (vii) the health care system, quality, safety and public health. The distribution of themes was similar across institutions and study arms. The level of reflection did not differ between study arms. Post-clerkship surveys showed that student preferences for blogging or essay writing were predicted by experience, with the majority favouring the method they had used. CONCLUSIONS: our study suggests there is no significant difference in themes addressed or levels of reflection achieved when students complete a similar assignment via online blogging or traditional essay writing. Given this, faculty staff should feel comfortable in utilising the blog format for reflective exercises. Faculty members could consider the option of using either format to address different learning styles of students.
    Source
    Med Educ. 2011 Feb;45(2):166-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03814.x. Link to article on publisher's site
    DOI
    10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03814.x
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36891
    PubMed ID
    21208262
    Related Resources
    Link to Article in PubMed
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03814.x
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.