Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStille, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.authorMazor, Kathleen M.
dc.contributor.authorMeterko, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorWasserman, Richard C.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:22.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:27:53Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2011-08-23
dc.date.submitted2011-11-03
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):692-7. Epub 2011 Feb 21. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045781">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn2044-5415 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045781
dc.identifier.pmid21339312
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36892
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To develop a template to promote brief but high-quality communication between paediatric primary care clinicians and consulting specialists. METHODS: Through an iterative process with academic and community-based paediatric primary care providers and specialists, the authors identified what content elements would be of value when communicating around referrals. The authors then developed a one-page template to encourage both primary care and specialty clinicians to include these elements when communicating about referrals. Trained clinician reviewers examined a sample of 206 referrals from community primary care providers (PCPs) to specialists in five paediatric specialties at an academic medical centre, coding communication content and rating the overall value of the referral communication. The relationship between the value ratings and each content element was examined to determine which content elements contributed to perceived value. RESULTS: Almost all content elements were associated with increased value as rated by clinician reviewers. The most valuable communications from PCP to specialist contained specific questions for the specialist and/or physical exam features, and the most valuable from specialist to PCP contained brief education for the PCP about the condition; all three elements were found in a minority of communications reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: A limited set of communication elements is suitable for a brief communication template in communication from paediatric PCPs to specialists. The use of such a template may add value to interphysician communication.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=21339312&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045781
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectInterprofessional Relations
dc.subjectPhysicians, Primary Care
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of a tool to improve paediatric referral/consultation communication
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ quality and safety
dc.source.volume20
dc.source.issue8
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/273
dc.identifier.contextkey2329007
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To develop a template to promote brief but high-quality communication between paediatric primary care clinicians and consulting specialists.</p> <p>METHODS: Through an iterative process with academic and community-based paediatric primary care providers and specialists, the authors identified what content elements would be of value when communicating around referrals. The authors then developed a one-page template to encourage both primary care and specialty clinicians to include these elements when communicating about referrals. Trained clinician reviewers examined a sample of 206 referrals from community primary care providers (PCPs) to specialists in five paediatric specialties at an academic medical centre, coding communication content and rating the overall value of the referral communication. The relationship between the value ratings and each content element was examined to determine which content elements contributed to perceived value.</p> <p>RESULTS: Almost all content elements were associated with increased value as rated by clinician reviewers. The most valuable communications from PCP to specialist contained specific questions for the specialist and/or physical exam features, and the most valuable from specialist to PCP contained brief education for the PCP about the condition; all three elements were found in a minority of communications reviewed.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: A limited set of communication elements is suitable for a brief communication template in communication from paediatric PCPs to specialists. The use of such a template may add value to interphysician communication.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/273
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.source.pages692-7


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record