Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaldor, Robert A.
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, W. Blair
dc.contributor.authorWarfield, Marji Erickson
dc.contributor.authorO'Shea, Kathleen
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:22.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:27:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:27:56Z
dc.date.issued2001-08-08
dc.date.submitted2011-12-09
dc.identifier.citationMed Educ. 2001 Aug;35(8):789-95. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00980.x
dc.identifier.issn0308-0110 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00980.x
dc.identifier.pmid11489108
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36902
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To assess the interest, perceptions, and needs of primary care physicians with regard to office-based precepting of medical students. DESIGN: Random survey. SETTING: The New England region of the United States (Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut). PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians, general internists and paediatricians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These included: (1) practice and preceptor demographics; (2) Likert scale agreement or disagreement with various positive and negative perceptions about precepting students; rating (from unimportant to necessary) of potential benefits from medical schools associated with the support of precepting in the office setting, and (3) comparisons among physician groups to determine differences in perceptions and needs. RESULTS: There is a high level of interest in precepting regardless of primary care specialty, practice structure, payment mechanism, or precepting experience. Negative impacts included decreased productivity and increased length of the day by a median of 60 minutes. Positive impacts included keeping one's own knowledge up-to-date and enhanced enjoyment of practice. Benefits such as academic appointments, continuing medical education credits, faculty development, computer linkages for clinical information and medical library access are rated highly. Monetary payment, whether as a modest honorarium or as compensation for lost time/income, was felt to be important by half of our sample. CONCLUSION: A significant interest in precepting medical students on a regular basis is expressed by primary care physicians in the ambulatory medicine setting. The results of this survey can be used by medical schools to address negative perceptions and to develop appropriate benefits packages to recruit and retain these primary care preceptors.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=11489108&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00980.x
dc.subjectEducation, Medical
dc.subjectFamily Practice
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNew England
dc.subjectPhysician's Role
dc.subjectPreceptorship
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectStudents, Medical
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.titleA survey of primary care physicians' perceptions and needs regarding the precepting of medical students in their offices
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleMedical education
dc.source.volume35
dc.source.issue8
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/282
dc.identifier.contextkey2396642
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: To assess the interest, perceptions, and needs of primary care physicians with regard to office-based precepting of medical students.</p> <p>DESIGN: Random survey.</p> <p>SETTING: The New England region of the United States (Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut).</p> <p>PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians, general internists and paediatricians.</p> <p>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These included: (1) practice and preceptor demographics; (2) Likert scale agreement or disagreement with various positive and negative perceptions about precepting students; rating (from unimportant to necessary) of potential benefits from medical schools associated with the support of precepting in the office setting, and (3) comparisons among physician groups to determine differences in perceptions and needs.</p> <p>RESULTS: There is a high level of interest in precepting regardless of primary care specialty, practice structure, payment mechanism, or precepting experience. Negative impacts included decreased productivity and increased length of the day by a median of 60 minutes. Positive impacts included keeping one's own knowledge up-to-date and enhanced enjoyment of practice. Benefits such as academic appointments, continuing medical education credits, faculty development, computer linkages for clinical information and medical library access are rated highly. Monetary payment, whether as a modest honorarium or as compensation for lost time/income, was felt to be important by half of our sample.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: A significant interest in precepting medical students on a regular basis is expressed by primary care physicians in the ambulatory medicine setting. The results of this survey can be used by medical schools to address negative perceptions and to develop appropriate benefits packages to recruit and retain these primary care preceptors.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/282
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pediatrics
dc.source.pages789-95


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record