Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStone, Sarah L.
dc.contributor.authorMazor, Kathleen M.
dc.contributor.authorDevaney-O'Neil, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorStarr, Susan
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Warren J.
dc.contributor.authorWellman, Scott
dc.contributor.authorJacobson, Eric
dc.contributor.authorHatem, David S.
dc.contributor.authorQuirk, Mark E.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:22.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:28:02Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:28:02Z
dc.date.issued2003-03-14
dc.date.submitted2011-12-09
dc.identifier.citationTeach Learn Med. 2003 Winter;15(1):7-13. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1501_03">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1040-1334 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1207/S15328015TLM1501_03
dc.identifier.pmid12632702
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/36924
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Faculty development programs focusing on teaching have become widespread. PURPOSE: Despite the popularity of such programs, evidence as to their effectiveness is limited. This article reports on the development of an objective structured teaching exercise (OSTE) and its pilot implementation in an evaluation of a faculty development program module. A written test intended to measure feedback skills was also developed and pilot tested. METHODS: A separate-sample, pretest-posttest design was used to pilot test both instruments. RESULTS: The results showed some evidence of significant differences between groups tested preworkshop and postworkshop. Higher scores were observed for the posttest group compared to the pretest group only for OSTE items focusing on prioritizing and limiting the amount of feedback given at one time and on action planning. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that an OSTE may be sensitive to changes in preceptor skill level for skills that are relatively easy to incorporate immediately into practice. Lack of differences in other skill areas may be due to lack of sensitivity of the measure or to need for practice and reflection before changes in performance on other feedback skills are evident.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=12632702&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1501_03
dc.subjectEducation, Medical
dc.subjectFaculty, Medical
dc.subjectFeedback, Psychological
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLearning
dc.subjectPilot Projects
dc.subjectProgram Evaluation
dc.subjectRandom Allocation
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectStaff Development
dc.subjectTeaching
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.titleDevelopment and implementation of an objective structured teaching exercise (OSTE) to evaluate improvement in feedback skills following a faculty development workshop
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleTeaching and learning in medicine
dc.source.volume15
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/306
dc.identifier.contextkey2396667
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Faculty development programs focusing on teaching have become widespread.</p> <p>PURPOSE: Despite the popularity of such programs, evidence as to their effectiveness is limited. This article reports on the development of an objective structured teaching exercise (OSTE) and its pilot implementation in an evaluation of a faculty development program module. A written test intended to measure feedback skills was also developed and pilot tested.</p> <p>METHODS: A separate-sample, pretest-posttest design was used to pilot test both instruments.</p> <p>RESULTS: The results showed some evidence of significant differences between groups tested preworkshop and postworkshop. Higher scores were observed for the posttest group compared to the pretest group only for OSTE items focusing on prioritizing and limiting the amount of feedback given at one time and on action planning.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that an OSTE may be sensitive to changes in preceptor skill level for skills that are relatively easy to incorporate immediately into practice. Lack of differences in other skill areas may be due to lack of sensitivity of the measure or to need for practice and reflection before changes in performance on other feedback skills are evident.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/306
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Internal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pediatrics
dc.source.pages7-13


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record