We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 11, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
Predicting nursing home adherence to a clinical trial intervention: lessons for the conduct of cluster randomized trials
Authors
Tjia, JenniferMazor, Kathleen M.
Field, Terry S.
Doherty, Peter P
Spenard, Ann
Gurwitz, Jerry H.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric MedicineMeyers Primary Care Institute
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2011-12-01Keywords
Cluster AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Nursing Homes
Geriatrics
Health Services Research
Primary Care
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe factors predictive of nursing home (NH) adherence to a clinical trial intervention. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a cluster randomized trial (CRT) evaluating a structured communication intervention to improve nurse-physician telephone communication in NHs. SETTING: NH. PARTICIPANTS: All eligible licensed nursing staff in all participating NHs. MEASUREMENTS: Adherence was defined as active participation for at least 3 months of the 12-month trial. NH characteristics hypothesized to affect trial outcomes (profit status, bed size, nursing staff time, NH quality, and leadership turnover) were measured a priori. The association between intervention adherence, NH characteristics and preintervention questionnaire response rate was examined. RESULTS: Of 13 intervention NHs, seven adhered to the intervention. Three factors differentiated adherent from nonadherent NHs: director of nursing turnover (nonadherent NHs 50% vs adherent NHs 0%, P = .03); Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) nurse staffing rating (range: 1-5) (nonadherent NHs mean 3.7 ± 0.5 vs adherent NHs mean 4.3 ± 0.5), P = .048); and questionnaire response rate (nonadherent NHs 15.6 ± 10.0% vs adherent NHs 34.2 ± 12.1%, P = .02). Profit status, bed size, and number of NH deficiencies on state surveys were not significantly associated with intervention adherence. CONCLUSION: CMS nurse staffing rating, leadership turnover, and questionnaire response rate are associated with adherence to a CRT intervention. Pretrial evaluation of NH staffing rating by CMS and of response to a questionnaire can help investigators improve trial efficiency by screening for NHs likely to adhere to a CRT intervention.Source
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Dec;59(12):2332-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03697.x. Epub 2011 Oct 31.DOI
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03697.xPermanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37113PubMed ID
22091689Related Resources
Link to article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03697.x