Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMazor, Kathleen M.
dc.contributor.authorHoltman, Matthew M.
dc.contributor.authorShchukin, Yakov
dc.contributor.authorMee, Janet
dc.contributor.authorKatsufrakis, Peter J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:23.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:28:57Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:28:57Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-14
dc.date.submitted2012-01-30
dc.identifier.citationAcad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10 Suppl):S63-7; quiz S68. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a6e5d">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1040-2446 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a6e5d
dc.identifier.pmid21955772
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37134
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Multisource feedback can provide a comprehensive picture of a medical trainee's performance. The utility of a multisource feedback system could be undermined by lack of direct observation and accurate knowledge. METHOD: The National Board of Medical Examiners conducted a national survey of medical students, interns, residents, chief residents, and fellows to learn the extent to which certain behaviors were observed, to examine beliefs about knowledge of each other's performance, and to assess feedback. RESULTS: Increased direct observation is associated with the perception of more accurate knowledge, which is associated with increased feedback. Some evaluators provide feedback in the absence of accurate knowledge of a trainee's performance, and others who have accurate knowledge miss opportunities for feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Direct observation is a key component of an effective multisource feedback system. Medical educators and residency directors may be well advised to establish explicit criteria specifying a minimum number of observations for evaluations.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=21955772&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822a6e5d
dc.subjectData Collection
dc.subjectEducational Measurement
dc.subject*Feedback
dc.subjectInternship and Residency
dc.subjectStudents, Medical
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.titleThe relationship between direct observation, knowledge, and feedback: results of a national survey
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
dc.source.volume86
dc.source.issue10 Suppl
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/511
dc.identifier.contextkey2479521
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Multisource feedback can provide a comprehensive picture of a medical trainee's performance. The utility of a multisource feedback system could be undermined by lack of direct observation and accurate knowledge.</p> <p>METHOD: The National Board of Medical Examiners conducted a national survey of medical students, interns, residents, chief residents, and fellows to learn the extent to which certain behaviors were observed, to examine beliefs about knowledge of each other's performance, and to assess feedback.</p> <p>RESULTS: Increased direct observation is associated with the perception of more accurate knowledge, which is associated with increased feedback. Some evaluators provide feedback in the absence of accurate knowledge of a trainee's performance, and others who have accurate knowledge miss opportunities for feedback.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Direct observation is a key component of an effective multisource feedback system. Medical educators and residency directors may be well advised to establish explicit criteria specifying a minimum number of observations for evaluations.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/511
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.source.pagesS63-7; quiz S68


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record