We are upgrading the repository! The content freeze has been extended to December 11, 2024, when we expect the new repository to become available. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed until after the new website goes live. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
Toward patient-centered cancer care: patient perceptions of problematic events, impact, and response
Authors
Mazor, Kathleen M.Roblin, Douglas W.
Greene, Sarah M.
Lemay, Celeste A.
Firneno, Cassandra L.
Calvi, Josephine
Prouty, Carolyn D.
Horner, Kathryn
Gallagher, Thomas H.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Center for Health Policy and Research, Office of Community ProgramsMeyers Primary Care Institute
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2012-05-20Keywords
AdultCooperative Behavior
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
*Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Maintenance Organizations
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Medical Errors
Medical Oncology
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
Organizational Objectives
Patient Care Team
Patient Safety
Patient-Centered Care
Patients
*Perception
Physician-Patient Relations
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
Young Adult
Health Services Research
Primary Care
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE: Cancer treatments are complex, involving multiple clinicians, toxic therapies, and uncertain outcomes. Consequently, patients are vulnerable when breakdowns in care occur. This study explored cancer patients' perceptions of preventable, harmful events; the impact of these events; and interactions with clinicians after such events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In-depth telephone interviews were conducted with cancer patients from three clinical sites. Patients were eligible if they believed: something "went wrong" during their cancer care; the event could have been prevented; and the event caused, or could have caused, significant harm. Interviews focused on patients' perceptions of the event, its impact, and clinicians' responses to the event. RESULTS: Ninety-three of 416 patients queried believed something had gone wrong in their care that was preventable and caused or could have caused harm. Seventy-eight patients completed interviews. Of those interviewed, 28% described a problem with medical care, such as a delay in diagnosis or treatment; 47% described a communication problem, including problems with information exchange or manner; and 24% described problems with both medical care and communication. Perceived harms included physical and emotional harm, disruption of life, effect on family members, damaged physician-patient relationship, and financial expense. Few clinicians initiated discussion of the problematic events. Most patients did not formally report their concerns. CONCLUSION: Cancer patients who believe they experienced a preventable, harmful event during their cancer diagnosis or care often do not formally report their concerns. Systems are needed to encourage patients to report such events and to help physicians and health care systems respond effectively.Source
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1784-90. Epub 2012 Apr 16. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1200/JCO.2011.38.1384Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37159PubMed ID
22508828Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1200/JCO.2011.38.1384
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Patient-Specific E-mailed Discharge Instructions Improve Patient Satisfaction and Patient Understanding After Surgical ArthroscopySantoro, Adam J; Ford, Elizabeth A; Pontes, Manuel; Busconi, Brian D; McMillan, Sean (2022-06-11)Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine whether patient-specific e-mails after surgical arthroscopy improve patient satisfaction and patient understanding of their procedure compared to traditional, preprinted discharge instructions. Methods: Sixty patients who underwent surgical arthroscopy were prospectively, randomized into two separate groups. One cohort received a detailed e-mail of their procedure, discharge instructions, and labeled intraoperative arthroscopic images, while the second cohort received the standard preprinted instructions, while their arthroscopic images were discussed at the time of follow-up. The procedures were performed by a single surgeon. All patients were seen at 1-week follow-up and given a 14-question survey specific to their postoperative course, discharge instructions, and overall satisfaction using a 5-point Likert Scale. Demographic information was collected and data points comparing overall patient satisfaction, ease of understanding instructions, quality of information, and the number of times referenced were analyzed using nonparametric tests between the two cohorts. Results: Patients in the e-mail cohort were significantly more satisfied with their surgery than patients in the printed cohort (medians: 5 versus 4, Wilcoxon chi-square = 9.98; P =.002). Patients in the e-mail cohort indicated that their instructions more greatly enhanced their overall understanding of their surgery (medians: 5 vs 3, Wilcoxon chi-square = 10.84; P = .001) and were more helpful to their recovery (medians: 5 vs 3, Wilcoxon chi-square = 7.37; P = .007). E-mail patients were significantly more likely to recommend similar instructions be sent to a friend undergoing surgery (medians: 5 versus 3, Wilcoxon chi-square = 11.10; P < .001) and share their instructions with others 72% (18/25) versus 34.5% (10/29). There was no significant difference between the e-mail cohort and the print cohort for the number of times patients referred to their instructions (medians: 3 versus 3, Wilcoxon chi-square = 2.41; P =.121). Conclusions: Patient-specific e-mailed discharge instructions improve patient satisfaction and overall understanding of the procedure compared with traditional printed discharge instructions after surgical arthroscopy. Level of evidence: Level II, prospective randomized trial.
-
Patient--provider communication: understanding the role of patient activation for Latinos in mental health treatmentCortes, Dharma E.; Mulvaney-Day, Norah; Fortuna, Lisa R.; Reinfeld, Sarah; Alegria, Margarita (2009-02-17)This article highlights results from the Right Question Project-Mental Health (RQP-MH), an intervention designed to teach skills in question formulation and to increase patients' participation in decisions about mental health treatment. Of participants in the RQP-MH intervention, 83% were from a Latino background, and 75% of the interviews were conducted in Spanish. The authors present the steps participants undertook in the process of becoming "activated" to formulate effective questions and develop decision-making skills in relation to their care. Findings suggest that patient activation and empowerment are interdependent because many of the skills (i.e., question formulation, direct patient-provider communication) required to become an "activated patient" are essential to achieve empowerment. Also, findings suggest that cultural and contextual factors can influence the experience of Latinos regarding participation in health care interactions. The authors provide recommendations for continued research on the patient activation process and further application of this strategy in the mental health field, especially with Latinos.
-
Patient navigation to promote smoking cessation among low-income primary care patients: a pilot randomized controlled trialLasser, Karen E.; Kenst, Karey S.; Quintiliani, Lisa M.; Wiener, Renda Soylemez; Murillo, Jennifer; Pbert, Lori; Xuan, Ziming; Bowen, Deborah J. (2013-11-12)We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a patient navigation intervention. Forty-seven smokers from one safety-net hospital were randomized to either a control group, in which they received a smoking cessation brochure and a list of smoking cessation resources, or a navigation group, in which they received the smoking cessation brochure, a list of smoking cessation resources, and patient navigation. Follow-up data were obtained for 33 participants. Nine (47.4%) of 19 of navigation group participants had engaged in smoking cessation treatment by 3 months versus 6 (42.9%) of 14 control group participants (chi-square p = ns). Patient navigation to promote engagement in smoking cessation treatment was feasible and acceptable to participants.