We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 11, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAsgari, Maryam M.
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jashin J.
dc.contributor.authorGelfand, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorSalman, Craig
dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.authorHarrold, Leslie R
dc.contributor.authorHerrinton, Lisa J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:24.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:29:23Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:29:23Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-01
dc.date.submitted2013-05-17
dc.identifier.citation<p>Asgari MM, Wu JJ, Gelfand JM, Salman C, Curtis JR, Harrold LR, Herrinton LJ. Validity of diagnostic codes and prevalence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a managed care population, 1996-2009. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Aug;22(8):842-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3447. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3447" target="_blank">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1053-8569 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pds.3447
dc.identifier.pmid23637091
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37231
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Few population-based studies have reported the prevalence of psoriatic disease. OBJECTIVE: We validated computerized diagnoses to estimate the prevalence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. METHOD: We identified adults with >/=1 ICD-9 diagnosis codes of 696.0 (psoriatic arthritis) or 696.1 (psoriasis) in clinical encounter data during 1996-2009 and used chart review to confirm the diagnoses in random samples of patients. We then used the best performing case-finding algorithms to estimate the point prevalence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. RESULTS: The number of persons with a diagnosis for psoriasis (ICD-9 code 696.1) was 87 827. Chart review of a random sample of 101 cases with at least one dermatologist-rendered psoriasis code revealed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90% (95% CI, 83-95) with sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 80-93). Psoriatic arthritis (code 696.0) was recorded for 5187 patients, with the best performing algorithm requiring >/=2 diagnoses recorded by a rheumatologist or >/=1 diagnosis recorded by a rheumatologist together with >/=1 psoriasis diagnoses recorded by a dermatologist; the PPV was 80% (95% CI, 70-88) with sensitivity 73% (95% CI, 63-82). Among KPNC adults, the point prevalence of psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, was 939 (95% CI, 765-1142) per 100 000, and the overall prevalence of psoriatic arthritis, with or without psoriasis, was 68 (95% CI, 54-84) per 100 000. CONCLUSION: Within an integrated health care delivery system, the use of computerized diagnoses rendered by relevant disease specialists is a valid method for identifying individuals with psoriatic disease. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23637091&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.3447
dc.subjectPsoriasis
dc.subjectArthritis, Psoriatic
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectComputerized medical information
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectIncidence
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectHealth maintenance organizations
dc.subjectPharmacoepidemiology
dc.subjectPsoriasis
dc.subjectPsoriatic arthritis
dc.subjectClinical Epidemiology
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
dc.subjectRheumatology
dc.subjectSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases
dc.titleValidity of diagnostic codes and prevalence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a managed care population, 1996-2009
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
dc.source.volume22
dc.source.issue8
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/648
dc.identifier.contextkey4151965
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Few population-based studies have reported the prevalence of psoriatic disease.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: We validated computerized diagnoses to estimate the prevalence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.</p> <p>METHOD: We identified adults with >/=1 ICD-9 diagnosis codes of 696.0 (psoriatic arthritis) or 696.1 (psoriasis) in clinical encounter data during 1996-2009 and used chart review to confirm the diagnoses in random samples of patients. We then used the best performing case-finding algorithms to estimate the point prevalence of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.</p> <p>RESULTS: The number of persons with a diagnosis for psoriasis (ICD-9 code 696.1) was 87 827. Chart review of a random sample of 101 cases with at least one dermatologist-rendered psoriasis code revealed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90% (95% CI, 83-95) with sensitivity of 88% (95% CI, 80-93). Psoriatic arthritis (code 696.0) was recorded for 5187 patients, with the best performing algorithm requiring >/=2 diagnoses recorded by a rheumatologist or >/=1 diagnosis recorded by a rheumatologist together with >/=1 psoriasis diagnoses recorded by a dermatologist; the PPV was 80% (95% CI, 70-88) with sensitivity 73% (95% CI, 63-82). Among KPNC adults, the point prevalence of psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis, was 939 (95% CI, 765-1142) per 100 000, and the overall prevalence of psoriatic arthritis, with or without psoriasis, was 68 (95% CI, 54-84) per 100 000.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Within an integrated health care delivery system, the use of computerized diagnoses rendered by relevant disease specialists is a valid method for identifying individuals with psoriatic disease.</p> <p>Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/648
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.source.pages842-9


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record