Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTjia, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorField, Terry S.
dc.contributor.authorLemay, Celeste A.
dc.contributor.authorMazor, Kathleen M.
dc.contributor.authorPandolfi, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorSpenard, Ann
dc.contributor.authorHo, Shih-Yieh
dc.contributor.authorKanaan, Abir O.
dc.contributor.authorDonovan, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorGurwitz, Jerry H.
dc.contributor.authorBriesacher, Becky A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:24.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:29:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:29:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-01
dc.date.submitted2014-10-03
dc.identifier.citationMed Care. 2014 Mar;52(3):267-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000076. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000076">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0025-7079 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MLR.0000000000000076
dc.identifier.pmid24374410
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37288
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The relationship between psychiatric consultation and antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes (NH) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To identify the association between psychiatric consultant groups and NH-level antipsychotic prescribing after adjustment for resident case-mix and facility characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Nested cross-sectional study of 60 NHs in a cluster randomized trial. We linked facility leadership surveys to October 2009-September 2010 Minimum Data Set, Nursing Home Compare, the US Census, and pharmacy dispensing data. MEASURES: The main exposure is the psychiatric consultant group and the main outcome is NH-level prevalence of atypical antipsychotic use. We calculated annual means and interquartile ranges of NH-level antipsychotic use for each consultant group and arrayed consultant groups from lowest to highest prevalence. Generalized linear models were used to predict antipsychotic prescribing adjusting for resident case-mix and facility characteristics. Observed versus predicted antipsychotic prescribing levels were compared for each consultant group. RESULTS: Seven psychiatric consultant groups served a range of 3-27 study facilities. Overall mean facility-level antipsychotic prescribing was 19.2%. Mean prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing ranged from 12.2% (SD, 5.8) in the lowest consultant group to 26.4% (SD, 3.6) in the highest group. All facilities served by the highest-ranked consultant group had observed antipsychotic levels exceeding the overall study mean with half exceeding predictions for on-label indications, whereas most facilities served by the lowest-ranked consultant group had observed levels below the overall study and predicted means. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests that psychiatric consultant groups affect NH antipsychotic prescribing independent of resident case-mix and facility characteristics.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=24374410&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000076
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAntipsychotic Agents
dc.subjectConsultants
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectDrug Utilization
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHomes for the Aged
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInappropriate Prescribing
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNursing Homes
dc.subjectPhysician's Practice Patterns
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectQuality of Health Care
dc.subjectChemical Actions and Uses
dc.subjectGeriatrics
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectPsychiatric and Mental Health
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectTherapeutics
dc.titleAntipsychotic use in nursing homes varies by psychiatric consultant
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleMedical care
dc.source.volume52
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/meyers_pp/701
dc.identifier.contextkey6201263
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: The relationship between psychiatric consultation and antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes (NH) is unknown.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: To identify the association between psychiatric consultant groups and NH-level antipsychotic prescribing after adjustment for resident case-mix and facility characteristics.</p> <p>RESEARCH DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Nested cross-sectional study of 60 NHs in a cluster randomized trial. We linked facility leadership surveys to October 2009-September 2010 Minimum Data Set, Nursing Home Compare, the US Census, and pharmacy dispensing data.</p> <p>MEASURES: The main exposure is the psychiatric consultant group and the main outcome is NH-level prevalence of atypical antipsychotic use. We calculated annual means and interquartile ranges of NH-level antipsychotic use for each consultant group and arrayed consultant groups from lowest to highest prevalence. Generalized linear models were used to predict antipsychotic prescribing adjusting for resident case-mix and facility characteristics. Observed versus predicted antipsychotic prescribing levels were compared for each consultant group.</p> <p>RESULTS: Seven psychiatric consultant groups served a range of 3-27 study facilities. Overall mean facility-level antipsychotic prescribing was 19.2%. Mean prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing ranged from 12.2% (SD, 5.8) in the lowest consultant group to 26.4% (SD, 3.6) in the highest group. All facilities served by the highest-ranked consultant group had observed antipsychotic levels exceeding the overall study mean with half exceeding predictions for on-label indications, whereas most facilities served by the lowest-ranked consultant group had observed levels below the overall study and predicted means.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests that psychiatric consultant groups affect NH antipsychotic prescribing independent of resident case-mix and facility characteristics.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathmeyers_pp/701
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine
dc.source.pages267-71


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record