Guideline concordance of testing for hyperkalemia and kidney dysfunction during initiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy in patients with heart failure
Authors
Allen, Larry A.Shetterly, Susan M.
Peterson, Pamela N.
Gurwitz, Jerry H.
Smith, David H.
Brand, David W.
Fairclough, Diane L.
Rumsfeld, John S.
Masoudi, Frederick A.
Magid, David J.
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2014-01-01Keywords
Acute Kidney InjuryAged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Creatinine
Female
*Guideline Adherence
Heart Failure
Humans
Hyperkalemia
Male
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
Monitoring, Physiologic
Patient Selection
Potassium
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume
Treatment Outcome
hyperkalemia mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists safety spironolactone
Cardiology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Health Services Administration
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) reduce morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction but can cause hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury. Guidelines recommend measurement of serum potassium (K) and creatinine (Cr) before and serially after MRA initiation, but the extent to which this occurs is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using electronic data from 3 health systems 2005 to 2008, we performed a retrospective review of laboratory monitoring among 490 patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were subsequently initiated on MRA therapy. Median age at time of MRA initiation was 73 years, and 37.1% were women. Spironolactone accounted for 99.4% of MRA use. Initial ambulatory MRA dispensing occurred at hospital discharge in 70.0% of cases. In the 30 days before MRA initiation, 94.3% of patients had a K or Cr measurement. Preinitiation K was >5.0 mmol/L in 1.4% and Cr>2.5 mg/dL in 1.7%. In the 7 days after MRA initiation among patients who remained alive and out of the hospital, 46.5% had no evidence of K measurement; by 30 days, 13.6% remained untested. Patient factors explained a small portion of postinitiation K testing (c-statistic, 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Although laboratory monitoring before MRA initiation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is common, laboratory monitoring after MRA initiation frequently does not meet guideline recommendations, even in patients at higher risk for complications. Quality improvement efforts that encourage the use of MRA should also include mechanisms to address recommended monitoring.Source
Circ Heart Fail. 2014 Jan;7(1):43-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000709. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000709Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37292PubMed ID
24281136Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000709