• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingUsage StatisticsAccessibilityTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Rochon, Paula A.
    Bero, Lisa A.
    Bay, Ari M.
    Gold, Jennifer L.
    Dergal, Julie M.
    Binns, Malcolm A.
    Streiner, David L.
    Gurwitz, Jerry H.
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine
    Meyers Primary Care Institute
    Document Type
    Journal Article
    Publication Date
    2002-06-05
    Keywords
    Consumer Satisfaction
    Humans
    Peer Review, Research
    Periodicals as Topic
    Publishing
    Reading
    Review Literature as Topic
    Health Services Research
    Medicine and Health Sciences
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2853
    Abstract
    CONTEXT: To compare the quality, presentation, readability, and clinical relevance of review articles published in peer-reviewed and "throwaway" journals. METHODS: We reviewed articles that focused on the diagnosis or treatment of a medical condition published between January 1 and December 31, 1998, in the 5 leading peer-reviewed general medical journals and high-circulation throwaway journals. Reviewers independently assessed the methodologic and reporting quality, and evaluated each article's presentation and readability. Clinical relevance was evaluated independently by 6 physicians. RESULTS: Of the 394 articles in our sample, 16 (4.1%) were peer-reviewed systematic reviews, 135 (34.3%) were peer-reviewed nonsystematic reviews, and 243 (61.7%) were nonsystematic reviews published in throwaway journals. The mean (SD) quality scores were highest for peer-reviewed articles (0.94 [0.09] for systematic reviews and 0.30 [0.19] for nonsystematic reviews) compared with throwaway journal articles (0.23 [0.03], F(2,391) = 280.8, P<.001). Throwaway journal articles used more tables (P =.02), figures (P =.01), photographs (P<.001), color (P<.001), and larger font sizes (P<.001) compared with peer-reviewed articles. Readability scores were more often in the college or higher range for peer-reviewed journals compared with the throwaway journal articles (104 [77.0%] vs 156 [64.2%]; P =.01). Peer-reviewed article titles were judged less relevant to clinical practice than throwaway journal article titles (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although lower in methodologic and reporting quality, review articles published in throwaway journals have characteristics that appeal to physician readers.
    Source
    JAMA. 2002;287:2853-2856.
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37318
    PubMed ID
    12038932; 12038932
    Related Resources
    Link to article in PubMed
    Collections
    UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Works found in eScholarship@UMassChan are protected by copyright unless otherwise indicated.
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.