Digital Repository Legacies: A Case Study in Assessing Organizational Trustworthiness
Abstract
Academic libraries rarely discuss cases of digital repositories that do not meet the standards expected of trusted digital repositories. Implications from inconsistent adherence to technical and professional criteria often surface during migration projects. In 2020, Stony Brook University Libraries began migrating assets to a mono-repository environment. Persistent historical factors presented challenges to repository trustworthiness. This case study discusses a survey project to evaluate legacy repository statuses in the contexts of infrastructure, documentation, and staff capacity. It considers a paradigm of organizational accountability in digital asset stewardship and offers insights for reconciling inherited legacies with aspirations to be a trusted repository.DOI
10.13028/0wc0-8r81Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37462Rights
Copyright 2021 © The Author(s). This is an open access document licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.13028/0wc0-8r81
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2021 © The Author(s). This is an open access document licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.