Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench
dc.contributor.author | Macleod, Malcolm R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fisher, Marc | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Collins, Victoria | |
dc.contributor.author | Sena, Emily S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dirnagl, Ulrich | |
dc.contributor.author | Bath, Philip M.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Buchan, Alistair | |
dc.contributor.author | van der Worp, H. Bart | |
dc.contributor.author | Traystman, Richard | |
dc.contributor.author | Minematsu, Kazuo | |
dc.contributor.author | Donnan, Geoffrey A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Howells, David W. | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:28.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:31:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:31:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-08-16 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-03-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):e50-2. Epub 2008 Aug 14. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.525386">Link to article on publisher's site</a> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0039-2499 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.525386 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18703798 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37693 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As a research community, we have failed to demonstrate that drugs which show substantial efficacy in animal models of cerebral ischemia can also improve outcome in human stroke. Summary of Review- Accumulating evidence suggests this may be due, at least in part, to problems in the design, conduct and reporting of animal experiments which create a systematic bias resulting in the overstatement of neuroprotective efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we set out a series of measures to reduce bias in the design, conduct and reporting of animal experiments modeling human stroke. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=18703798&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
dc.relation.url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.525386 | |
dc.subject | Animals | |
dc.subject | *Bias (Epidemiology) | |
dc.subject | Conflict of Interest | |
dc.subject | Disease Models, Animal | |
dc.subject | Drug Industry | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Random Allocation | |
dc.subject | Research Design | |
dc.subject | Research Support as Topic | |
dc.subject | Sample Size | |
dc.subject | Stroke | |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.subject | Neurology | |
dc.subject | Neuroscience and Neurobiology | |
dc.title | Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation | |
dc.source.volume | 40 | |
dc.source.issue | 3 | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/neuro_pp/368 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1242240 | |
html.description.abstract | <p>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As a research community, we have failed to demonstrate that drugs which show substantial efficacy in animal models of cerebral ischemia can also improve outcome in human stroke. Summary of Review- Accumulating evidence suggests this may be due, at least in part, to problems in the design, conduct and reporting of animal experiments which create a systematic bias resulting in the overstatement of neuroprotective efficacy.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Here, we set out a series of measures to reduce bias in the design, conduct and reporting of animal experiments modeling human stroke.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | neuro_pp/368 | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Neurology | |
dc.source.pages | e50-2 |