Effectiveness and safety of transcranial laser therapy for acute ischemic stroke
Authors
Zivin, Justin A.Albers, Gregory W.
Bornstein, Natan
Chippendale, Thomas
Dahlof, Bjorn
Devlin, Thomas
Fisher, Marc
Hacke, Werner
Holt, William
Ilic, Sanja
Kasner, Scott
Lew, Robert
Nash, Marshall
Perez, Julio
Rymer, Marilyn
Schellinger, Peter
Schneider, Dietmar
Schwab, Stefan
Veltkamp, Roland
Walker, Michael
Streeter, Jackson
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of NeurologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2009-02-24Keywords
Acute DiseaseAdult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Ischemia
Female
Humans
Infrared Rays
Laser Therapy, Low-Level
Male
Middle Aged
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke
Treatment Outcome
Neurology
Neuroscience and Neurobiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We hypothesized that transcranial laser therapy (TLT) can use near-infrared laser technology to treat acute ischemic stroke. The NeuroThera Effectiveness and Safety Trial-2 (NEST-2) tested the safety and efficacy of TLT in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized study compared TLT treatment to sham control. Patients receiving tissue plasminogen activator and patients with evidence of hemorrhagic infarct were excluded. The primary efficacy end point was a favorable 90-day score of 0 to 2 assessed by the modified Rankin Scale. Other 90-day end points included the overall shift in modified Rankin Scale and assessments of change in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. RESULTS: We randomized 660 patients: 331 received TLT and 327 received sham; 120 (36.3%) in the TLT group achieved favorable outcome versus 101 (30.9%), in the sham group (P=0.094), odds ratio 1.38 (95% CI, 0.95 to 2.00). Comparable results were seen for the other outcome measures. Although no prespecified test achieved significance, a post hoc analysis of patients with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of <16 showed a favorable outcome at 90 days on the primary end point (P<0.044). Mortality rates and serious adverse events did not differ between groups with 17.5% and 17.4% mortality, 37.8% and 41.8% serious adverse events for TLT and sham, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TLT within 24 hours from stroke onset demonstrated safety but did not meet formal statistical significance for efficacy. However, all predefined analyses showed a favorable trend, consistent with the previous clinical trial (NEST-1). Both studies indicate that mortality and adverse event rates were not adversely affected by TLT. A definitive trial with refined baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale exclusion criteria is planned.Source
Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):1359-64. Epub 2009 Feb 20. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.547547Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37698PubMed ID
19233936Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.547547