Complications and pitfalls in rat stroke models for middle cerebral artery occlusion: a comparison between the suture and the macrosphere model using magnetic resonance angiography
Authors
Gerriets, TiboStolz, Erwin
Walberer, Maureen
Muller, Clemens
Rottger, Carina
Kluge, Alexander
Kaps, Manfred
Fisher, Marc
Bachmann, Georg
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of NeurologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2004-10-01Keywords
AnimalsCarotid Artery, External
*Disease Models, Animal
*Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery
Ligation
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Microspheres
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Suture Techniques
Titanium
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
Neurology
Neuroscience and Neurobiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Investigating focal cerebral ischemia requires animal models that are relevant to human stroke. Complications and side effects are common among these models. The present study describes potential pitfalls in 3 techniques for middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). METHODS: Rats were subjected to temporary MCAO for 90 minutes using the suture technique (group I; n=10) or to permanent MCAO using the suture technique (group II; n=10) or the macrosphere technique (group III; n=10). Clinical evaluation was performed after 3 hours and 24 hours. After 24 hours, animals underwent MRI and MRA to determine lesion size and the intracranial vascular status. RESULTS: Hemispheric lesion volume was significantly smaller in group I (14.6%) compared with groups II (35.2%; PCONCLUSIONS: Model failures occurred frequently in all groups. MRI and MRA helps to identify animals that need to be excluded from experimental stroke studies.Source
Stroke. 2004 Oct;35(10):2372-7. Epub 2004 Sep 2. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1161/01.STR.0000142134.37512.a7Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/37791PubMed ID
15345802Related Resources
Link to article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/01.STR.0000142134.37512.a7