A clock shock: mouse CLOCK is not required for circadian oscillator function
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
DeBruyne, Jason P.Noton, Elizabeth
Lambert, Christopher M.
Maywood, Elizabeth S.
Weaver, David R.
Reppert, Steven M.
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2006-05-04Keywords
ARNTL Transcription FactorsAnimals
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors
Biological Clocks
CLOCK Proteins
Circadian Rhythm
Dimerization
Feedback, Physiological
Light
Liver
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Knockout
Mice, Transgenic
Motor Activity
Phenotype
Photic Stimulation
RNA, Messenger
Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
Trans-Activators
Neuroscience and Neurobiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The circadian clock mechanism in the mouse is composed of interlocking transcriptional feedback loops. Two transcription factors, CLOCK and BMAL1, are believed to be essential components of the circadian clock. We have used the Cre-LoxP system to generate whole-animal knockouts of CLOCK and evaluated the resultant circadian phenotypes. Surprisingly, CLOCK-deficient mice continue to express robust circadian rhythms in locomotor activity, although they do have altered responses to light. At the molecular and biochemical levels, clock gene mRNA and protein levels in both the master clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and a peripheral clock in the liver show alterations in the CLOCK-deficient animals, although the molecular feedback loops continue to function. Our data challenge a central feature of the current mammalian circadian clock model regarding the necessity of CLOCK:BMAL1 heterodimers for clock function.Source
Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):465-77. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.041Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/38024PubMed ID
16675400Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.041