Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcIlvane, William J.
dc.contributor.authorKledaras, Joanne B.
dc.contributor.authorCallahan, T C.
dc.contributor.authorDube, William V.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:30.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:33:38Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:33:38Z
dc.date.issued2002-04-09
dc.date.submitted2008-10-31
dc.identifier.citationJ Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Mar;77(2):189-98. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.77-189">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0022-5002 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1901/jeab.2002.77-189
dc.identifier.pmid11936251
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/38149
dc.description.abstractExperimenters and teachers use discrimination learning procedures to encourage reliable attending to stimulus differences defined as relevant for their purposes. Put another way, the goal of discrimination training is to establish high-probability stimulus control topographies that are coherent with experimenter or teacher specifications. The present research was conducted to investigate a novel procedure for encouraging stimulus control topography coherence. Participants were 13 adolescents with severe intellectual handicaps. During an initial Condition A, all were exposed to a simultaneous discrimination procedure. Participants could select a form alternating with a black field (S+) or an identical form that did not alternate (S-). Accuracy scores were typically low, and there was little evidence of coherent stimulus control topographies. Subsequently, the procedure was changed. During Condition B, every trial initially presented two identical nonalternating S- forms (Trial State 1). If the participant made no selection for 5 s, one of the forms began to alternate with the black field, and he or she could make the S+/S- discrimination (Trial State 2). Selections during Trial State I prolonged the delay to Trial State 2 until there had been no response for 5 s. During Condition B, S+/S- discrimination accuracy scores improved rapidly and markedly for most participants. Reinstating Condition A often resulted in diminished accuracy scores. This study thus (a) demonstrated a novel procedure for encouraging stimulus control topography coherence and (b) provided support for the interpretation that intermediate accuracy scores may be due to different topographies of stimulus control that co-occur in the same discriminative baseline.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=11936251&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAssociation Learning
dc.subject*Attention
dc.subject*Discrimination Learning
dc.subjectEducation of Mentally Retarded
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMental Retardation
dc.subject*Pattern Recognition, Visual
dc.subject*Probability Learning
dc.subject*Psychomotor Performance
dc.subjectToken Economy
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.titleHigh-probability stimulus control topographies with delayed S+ onset in a simultaneous discrimination procedure
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior
dc.source.volume77
dc.source.issue2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2031&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/1032
dc.identifier.contextkey659217
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:33:38Z
html.description.abstract<p>Experimenters and teachers use discrimination learning procedures to encourage reliable attending to stimulus differences defined as relevant for their purposes. Put another way, the goal of discrimination training is to establish high-probability stimulus control topographies that are coherent with experimenter or teacher specifications. The present research was conducted to investigate a novel procedure for encouraging stimulus control topography coherence. Participants were 13 adolescents with severe intellectual handicaps. During an initial Condition A, all were exposed to a simultaneous discrimination procedure. Participants could select a form alternating with a black field (S+) or an identical form that did not alternate (S-). Accuracy scores were typically low, and there was little evidence of coherent stimulus control topographies. Subsequently, the procedure was changed. During Condition B, every trial initially presented two identical nonalternating S- forms (Trial State 1). If the participant made no selection for 5 s, one of the forms began to alternate with the black field, and he or she could make the S+/S- discrimination (Trial State 2). Selections during Trial State I prolonged the delay to Trial State 2 until there had been no response for 5 s. During Condition B, S+/S- discrimination accuracy scores improved rapidly and markedly for most participants. Reinstating Condition A often resulted in diminished accuracy scores. This study thus (a) demonstrated a novel procedure for encouraging stimulus control topography coherence and (b) provided support for the interpretation that intermediate accuracy scores may be due to different topographies of stimulus control that co-occur in the same discriminative baseline.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/1032
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
dc.source.pages189-98


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
11936251.pdf
Size:
163.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record