Dynamics of memory T cell proliferation under conditions of heterologous immunity and bystander stimulation
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of PathologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2002-06-22Keywords
Adoptive TransferAnimals
Arenaviridae Infections
Bystander Effect
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes
Cell Cycle
Cell Division
Cell Line
Cricetinae
Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte
Fluoresceins
Fluorescent Dyes
*Immunologic Memory
Lymphocyte Activation
Lymphocyte Count
Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis
control
Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Pichinde virus
Poly I-C
Succinimides
T-Lymphocyte Subsets
Life Sciences
Medicine and Health Sciences
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
By examining adoptively transferred CSFE-labeled lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV)-immune donor T cells in Thy-1 congenic hosts inoculated with viruses or with the cytokine inducer poly(I:C), strikingly different responses of bona fide memory T cells were found in response to different stimuli. Poly(I:C) (cytokine) stimulation caused a limited synchronized division of memory CD8 T cells specific to each of five LCMV epitopes, with no increase and sometimes a loss in number, and no change in their epitope hierarchy. Homologous LCMV infection caused more than seven divisions of T cells specific for each epitope, with dramatic increases in number and minor changes in hierarchy. Infections with the heterologous viruses Pichinde and vaccinia (VV) caused more than seven divisions and increases in number of T cells specific to some putatively cross-reactive but not other epitopes and resulted in substantial changes in the hierarchy of the LCMV-specific T cells. Hence, there can be memory T cell division without proliferation (i.e., increase in cell number) in the absence of Ag and division with proliferation in the presence of Ag from homologous or heterologous viruses. Heterologous protective immunity between viruses is not necessarily reciprocal, given that LCMV protects against VV but VV does not protect against LCMV. VV elicited proliferation of LCMV-induced CD8 and CD4 T cells, whereas LCMV did not elicit proliferation of VV-induced T cells. Thus, depending on the pathogen and the sequence of infection, a heterologous agent may selectively stimulate the memory pool in patterns consistent with heterologous immunity.Source
J Immunol. 2002 Jul 1;169(1):90-8.
DOI
10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.90Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/38244PubMed ID
12077233Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.4049/jimmunol.169.1.90
Scopus Count
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Independent regulation of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-specific T cell memory pools: relative stability of CD4 memory under conditions of CD8 memory T cell lossVarga, Steven Michael; Selin, Liisa K.; Welsh, Raymond M. (2001-02-13)Infection of mice with a series of heterologous viruses causes a reduction of memory CD8(+) T cells specific to viruses from earlier infections, but the fate of the virus-specific memory CD4(+) T cell pool following multiple virus infections has been unknown. We have previously reported that the virus-specific CD4(+) Th precursor (Thp) frequency remains stable into long-term immunity following lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection. In this study, we questioned whether heterologous virus infections or injection with soluble protein CD4 Ags would impact this stable LCMV-specific CD4(+) Thp memory pool. Limiting dilution analyses for IL-2-producing cells and intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-gamma revealed that the LCMV-specific CD4(+) Thp frequency remains relatively stable following multiple heterologous virus infections or protein Ag immunizations, even under conditions that dramatically reduce the LCMV-specific CD8(+) CTL precursor frequency. These data indicate that the CD4(+) and CD8(+) memory T cell pools are regulated independently and that the loss in CD8(+) T cell memory following heterologous virus infections is not a consequence of a parallel loss in the memory CD4(+) T cell population.
-
Attrition of virus-specific memory CD8+ T cells during reconstitution of lymphopenic environmentsPeacock, Craig D.; Kim, Sung-Kwon; Welsh, Raymond M. (2003-07-09)Viruses can cause a severe lymphopenia early in infection and a subsequent, lasting loss of pre-existing CD8(+) memory T cells. We therefore questioned how well virus Ag-specific memory CD8(+) T cells could reconstitute mice rendered lymphopenic as a consequence of genetics, irradiation, or viral or poly(I:C)-induced cytokines. In each case, reconstitution of the CD8(+) compartment was associated with limited division of virus-specific memory T cells and a reduction in their proportion. This indicates that foreign Ag-experienced CD44(high)CD8(+) memory T cells may respond differently to homeostatic signals than other CD44(high)CD8(+) cells, and that events inducing lymphopenia may lead to a permanent reduction in T cell memory.
-
Infections that induce autoimmune diabetes in BBDR rats modulate CD4+CD25+ T cell populationsZipris, Danny; Hillebrands, Jan-Luuk; Welsh, Raymond M.; Rozing, Jan; Xie, Jenny X.; Mordes, John P.; Greiner, Dale L.; Rossini, Aldo A. (2003-03-21)Viruses are believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune type 1A diabetes in humans. This pathogenic process can be modeled in the BBDR rat, which develops pancreatic insulitis and type 1A-like diabetes after infection with Kilham's rat virus (RV). The mechanism is unknown, but does not involve infection of the pancreatic islets. We first documented that RV infection of BBDR rats induces diabetes, whereas infection with its close homologue H-1 does not. Both viruses induced similar humoral and cellular immune responses in the host, but only RV also caused a decrease in splenic CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in both BBDR rats and normal WF rats. Surprisingly, RV infection increased CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells in pancreatic lymph nodes of BBDR but not WF rats. This increase appeared to be due to the accumulation of nonproliferating CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. The results imply that the reduction in splenic CD4(+)CD25(+) cells observed in RV-infected animals is virus specific, whereas the increase in pancreatic lymph node CD4(+)CD25(+) cells is both virus and rat strain specific. The data suggest that RV but not H-1 infection alters T cell regulation in BBDR rats and permits the expression of autoimmune diabetes. More generally, the results suggest a mechanism that could link an underlying genetic predisposition to environmental perturbation and transform a "regulated predisposition" into autoimmune diabetes, namely, failure to maintain regulatory CD4(+)CD25(+) T cell function.