Show simple item record

dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:36:36Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:36:36Z
dc.date.issued1999-12-03
dc.date.submitted2009-03-31
dc.identifier.citationStroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2752-8.
dc.identifier.issn0039-2499 (Print)
dc.identifier.pmid10583007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/38821
dc.description.abstractThe plethora of failed clinical trials with neuroprotective drugs for acute ischemic stroke have raised justifiable concerns about how best to proceed for the future development of such interventions. Preclinical testing of neuroprotective drugs is an important aspect of assessing their therapeutic potential, but guidelines concerning how to perform preclinical development of purported neuroprotective drugs for acute ischemic stroke are lacking. This conference of academicians and industry representatives was convened to suggest such guidelines for the preclinical evaluation of neuroprotective drugs and to recommend to potential clinical investigators the data they should review to reassure themselves that a particular neuroprotective drug has a reasonable chance to succeed in an appropriately designed clinical trial. Without rigorous, robust, and detailed preclinical evaluation, it is unlikely that novel neuroprotective drugs will prove to be effective when tested in large, time-consuming, and expensive clinical trials. Additionally, similar recommendations are provided for drugs with the potential to enhance recovery after acute ischemic stroke, a burgeoning new field with great potential but little currently available data. The suggestions contained in this document are meant to serve as overall guidelines that must be adapted to the individual characteristics related to particular drugs and their preclinical and clinical development needs.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=10583007&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectDisease Models, Animal
dc.subjectDrug Combinations
dc.subjectDrug Evaluation, Preclinical
dc.subjectEnzymes
dc.subjectGuidelines as Topic
dc.subjectNeuroprotective Agents
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjectPrimates
dc.subjectRats
dc.subjectRemission, Spontaneous
dc.subjectSex Factors
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleRecommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleStroke; a journal of cerebral circulation
dc.source.volume30
dc.source.issue12
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2662&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/1663
dc.identifier.contextkey805484
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:36:36Z
html.description.abstract<p>The plethora of failed clinical trials with neuroprotective drugs for acute ischemic stroke have raised justifiable concerns about how best to proceed for the future development of such interventions. Preclinical testing of neuroprotective drugs is an important aspect of assessing their therapeutic potential, but guidelines concerning how to perform preclinical development of purported neuroprotective drugs for acute ischemic stroke are lacking. This conference of academicians and industry representatives was convened to suggest such guidelines for the preclinical evaluation of neuroprotective drugs and to recommend to potential clinical investigators the data they should review to reassure themselves that a particular neuroprotective drug has a reasonable chance to succeed in an appropriately designed clinical trial. Without rigorous, robust, and detailed preclinical evaluation, it is unlikely that novel neuroprotective drugs will prove to be effective when tested in large, time-consuming, and expensive clinical trials. Additionally, similar recommendations are provided for drugs with the potential to enhance recovery after acute ischemic stroke, a burgeoning new field with great potential but little currently available data. The suggestions contained in this document are meant to serve as overall guidelines that must be adapted to the individual characteristics related to particular drugs and their preclinical and clinical development needs.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/1663
dc.contributor.departmentUMass/Memorial Health Care
dc.source.pages2752-8


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
10583007.pdf
Size:
162.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record