Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStille, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.authorJerant, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorBell, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorMeltzer, David
dc.contributor.authorElmore, Joann G.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:36:43Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:36:43Z
dc.date.issued2005-04-20
dc.date.submitted2008-02-29
dc.identifier.citation<p>Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr 19;142(8):700-8.</p>
dc.identifier.issn1539-3704 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.doi10.7326/0003-4819-142-8-200504190-00038
dc.identifier.pmid15838089
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/38850
dc.description.abstractCoordinated care is a defining principle of primary care, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to provide as the health care delivery system in the United States becomes more complex. To guide recommendations for research and practice, the evidence about implementation of coordinated care and its benefits must be considered. On the basis of review of the published literature this article makes recommendations concerning needs for a better-developed evidence base to substantiate the value of care coordination, generalist practices to be the hub of care coordination for most patients, improved communication among clinicians, a team approach to achieve coordination, integration of patients and families as partners, and incorporation of medical informatics. Although coordination of care is central to generalist practice, it requires far more effort than physicians alone can deliver. To make policy recommendations, further work is needed to identify essential elements of care coordination and prove its effectiveness at improving health outcomes.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15838089&dopt=Abstract ">Link to article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-8-200504190-00038
dc.subjectInterprofessional Relations
dc.subjectMedical Informatics
dc.subjectPatient Care Team
dc.subject*Physician's Role
dc.subject*Physicians, Family
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care
dc.subjectQuality of Health Care
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleCoordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAnnals of internal medicine
dc.source.volume142
dc.source.issue8
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/169
dc.identifier.contextkey441934
html.description.abstract<p>Coordinated care is a defining principle of primary care, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to provide as the health care delivery system in the United States becomes more complex. To guide recommendations for research and practice, the evidence about implementation of coordinated care and its benefits must be considered. On the basis of review of the published literature this article makes recommendations concerning needs for a better-developed evidence base to substantiate the value of care coordination, generalist practices to be the hub of care coordination for most patients, improved communication among clinicians, a team approach to achieve coordination, integration of patients and families as partners, and incorporation of medical informatics. Although coordination of care is central to generalist practice, it requires far more effort than physicians alone can deliver. To make policy recommendations, further work is needed to identify essential elements of care coordination and prove its effectiveness at improving health outcomes.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/169
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pediatrics
dc.source.pages700-8


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record