Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWillis, Nicholas Adrian
dc.contributor.authorRhind, Nicholas R.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:39.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:38:44Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:38:44Z
dc.date.issued2009-07-07
dc.date.submitted2010-03-29
dc.identifier.citation<p>Cell Div. 2009 Jul 3;4:13. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-4-13">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1747-1028 (Electronic)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1747-1028-4-13
dc.identifier.pmid19575778
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/39315
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT: Cells slow replication in response to DNA damage. This slowing was the first DNA damage checkpoint response discovered and its study led to the discovery of the central checkpoint kinase, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM). Nonetheless, the manner by which the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint slows replication is still unclear. The checkpoint could slow bulk replication by inhibiting replication origin firing or slowing replication fork progression, and both mechanisms appear to be used. However, assays in various systems using different DNA damaging agents have produced conflicting results as to the relative importance of the two mechanisms. Furthermore, although progress has been made in elucidating the mechanism of origin regulation in vertebrates, the mechanism by which forks are slowed remains unknown. We review both past and present efforts towards determining how cells slow replication in response to damage and try to resolve apparent conflicts and discrepancies within the field. We propose that inhibition of origin firing is a global checkpoint mechanism that reduces overall DNA synthesis whenever the checkpoint is activated, whereas slowing of fork progression reflects a local checkpoint mechanism that only affects replisomes as they encounter DNA damage and therefore only affects overall replication rates in cases of high lesion density.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19575778&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rights© 2009 Willis and Rhind; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleRegulation of DNA replication by the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleCell division
dc.source.volume4
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3114&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/2115
dc.identifier.contextkey1250246
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:38:45Z
html.description.abstract<p>ABSTRACT: Cells slow replication in response to DNA damage. This slowing was the first DNA damage checkpoint response discovered and its study led to the discovery of the central checkpoint kinase, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM). Nonetheless, the manner by which the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint slows replication is still unclear. The checkpoint could slow bulk replication by inhibiting replication origin firing or slowing replication fork progression, and both mechanisms appear to be used. However, assays in various systems using different DNA damaging agents have produced conflicting results as to the relative importance of the two mechanisms. Furthermore, although progress has been made in elucidating the mechanism of origin regulation in vertebrates, the mechanism by which forks are slowed remains unknown. We review both past and present efforts towards determining how cells slow replication in response to damage and try to resolve apparent conflicts and discrepancies within the field. We propose that inhibition of origin firing is a global checkpoint mechanism that reduces overall DNA synthesis whenever the checkpoint is activated, whereas slowing of fork progression reflects a local checkpoint mechanism that only affects replisomes as they encounter DNA damage and therefore only affects overall replication rates in cases of high lesion density.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/2115
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology
dc.source.pages13


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1747_1028_4_13.pdf
Size:
472.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record