Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOza, Pranav O.
dc.contributor.authorJaspersen, Sue L.
dc.contributor.authorMiele, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorDekker, Job
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Craig L.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:39.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:38:50Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:38:50Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-15
dc.date.submitted2010-03-30
dc.identifier.citationGenes Dev. 2009 Apr 15;23(8):912-27. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1782209">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0890-9369 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1101/gad.1782209
dc.identifier.pmid19390086
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/39334
dc.description.abstractDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious forms of DNA lesions in cells. Here we induced site-specific DSBs in yeast cells and monitored chromatin dynamics surrounding the DSB using Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C). We find that formation of a DSB within G1 cells is not sufficient to alter chromosome dynamics. However, DSBs formed within an asynchronous cell population result in large decreases in both intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Using live cell microscopy, we find that changes in chromosome dynamics correlate with relocalization of the DSB to the nuclear periphery. Sequestration to the periphery requires the nuclear envelope protein, Mps3p, and Mps3p-dependent tethering delays recombinational repair of a DSB and enhances gross chromosomal rearrangements. Furthermore, we show that components of the telomerase machinery are recruited to a DSB and that telomerase recruitment is required for its peripheral localization. Based on these findings, we propose that sequestration of unrepaired or slowly repaired DSBs to the nuclear periphery reflects a competition between alternative repair pathways.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19390086&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2675867/pdf/912.pdf
dc.subjectCell Nucleus
dc.subjectChromatin
dc.subjectChromosomes, Fungal
dc.subject*DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
dc.subjectDNA Helicases
dc.subjectDNA-Binding Proteins
dc.subjectGenetic Techniques
dc.subjectMembrane Proteins
dc.subjectMicroscopy
dc.subjectNuclear Proteins
dc.subjectSaccharomyces cerevisiae
dc.subjectSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
dc.subjectTelomerase
dc.subjectTelomere-Binding Proteins
dc.subjectUbiquitin-Protein Ligases
dc.subjectGenetics and Genomics
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleMechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleGenes and development
dc.source.volume23
dc.source.issue8
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/2133
dc.identifier.contextkey1253145
html.description.abstract<p>DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious forms of DNA lesions in cells. Here we induced site-specific DSBs in yeast cells and monitored chromatin dynamics surrounding the DSB using Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C). We find that formation of a DSB within G1 cells is not sufficient to alter chromosome dynamics. However, DSBs formed within an asynchronous cell population result in large decreases in both intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Using live cell microscopy, we find that changes in chromosome dynamics correlate with relocalization of the DSB to the nuclear periphery. Sequestration to the periphery requires the nuclear envelope protein, Mps3p, and Mps3p-dependent tethering delays recombinational repair of a DSB and enhances gross chromosomal rearrangements. Furthermore, we show that components of the telomerase machinery are recruited to a DSB and that telomerase recruitment is required for its peripheral localization. Based on these findings, we propose that sequestration of unrepaired or slowly repaired DSBs to the nuclear periphery reflects a competition between alternative repair pathways.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/2133
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Gene Function and Expression
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Molecular Medicine
dc.source.pages912-27


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record