We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 11, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
Experience with endoluminal colonic wall stents for the management of large bowel obstruction for benign and malignant disease
Authors
Tamim, Wael Z.Ghallai, Ali
Counihan, Timothy C.
Swanson, Richard S.
Colby, Jay M.
Sweeney, W. Brian
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2000-04-18Keywords
AdultAged
Aged, 80 and over
Endoscopy
Female
Humans
Intestinal Neoplasms
Intestinal Obstruction
Male
Middle Aged
*Stents
Treatment Outcome
Life Sciences
Medicine and Health Sciences
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
HYPOTHESIS: To assess the applicability and efficacy of endoluminal colonic wall stents (ECWSs) in the management of large bowel obstruction (LBO). DESIGN: Inception cohort study. SETTING: University-based tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Eleven consecutive patients with LBO in the absence of peritonitis. INTERVENTION: Placement of ECWS under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The success rate in ECWS placement, the efficacy in decompressing the obstruction, and the patency rate of the ECWS. RESULTS: Successful placement of ECWSs was obtainable in 10 of 11 patients. Once placed, all 10 patients achieved immediate decompression of their LBO. Eight patients had malignant obstructions associated with distant spread of disease; 3 patients had diverticular disease. Among those with malignant obstruction, 6 patients had successful and lasting palliation without colostomy, 1 patient underwent 1-stage resection 1 month later with no evidence of obstruction, and 1 patient could not be stented so diversion was done. None of the patients with diverticular disease required diversion: 2 had complete bowel preparation followed by resection with primary anastomosis, whereas the third declined surgery. Four of the 10 patients required overlapping ECWSs to bridge the stricture. One patient required a second ECWS secondary to recurrence of obstruction after stent migration and has continued palliation of his stage 4 rectal cancer for the last 11 months. No other complications were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent surgery with colostomy for LBO was avoided in 10 of 11 patients because of successful placement of ECWSs. We believe that endoscopic colonic stenting is safe, effective, and lasting, and should be considered as initial nonoperative management in all patients seen with LBO in the absence of peritonitis.Source
Arch Surg. 2000 Apr;135(4):434-8.
DOI
10.1001/archsurg.135.4.434Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/39762PubMed ID
10768708Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1001/archsurg.135.4.434