Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPickett, Christopher L.
dc.contributor.authorCorb, Benjamin W.
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, C. Robert
dc.contributor.authorSundquist, Wesley I.
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Jeremy M.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:43.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:41:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:41:09Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-01
dc.date.submitted2015-12-08
dc.identifier.citationProc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 1;112(35):10832-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509901112. Epub 2015 Jul 20.<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509901112">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.1509901112
dc.identifier.pmid26195768
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/39824
dc.description.abstractThe US research enterprise is under significant strain due to stagnant funding, an expanding workforce, and complex regulations that increase costs and slow the pace of research. In response, a number of groups have analyzed the problems and offered recommendations for resolving these issues. However, many of these recommendations lacked follow-up implementation, allowing the damage of stagnant funding and outdated policies to persist. Here, we analyze nine reports published since the beginning of 2012 and consolidate over 250 suggestions into eight consensus recommendations made by the majority of the reports. We then propose how to implement these consensus recommendations, and we identify critical issues, such as improving workforce diversity and stakeholder interactions, on which the community has yet to achieve consensus.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=26195768&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.rights<p>Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.</p>
dc.subjectbiomedical workforce
dc.subjectgraduate training
dc.subjectpostdoc training
dc.subjectresearch funding
dc.subjectresearch regulation
dc.subjectLaboratory and Basic Science Research
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.subjectScience and Technology Policy
dc.titleToward a sustainable biomedical research enterprise: Finding consensus and implementing recommendations
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
dc.source.volume112
dc.source.issue35
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3625&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/2621
dc.identifier.contextkey7920040
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:41:09Z
html.description.abstract<p>The US research enterprise is under significant strain due to stagnant funding, an expanding workforce, and complex regulations that increase costs and slow the pace of research. In response, a number of groups have analyzed the problems and offered recommendations for resolving these issues. However, many of these recommendations lacked follow-up implementation, allowing the damage of stagnant funding and outdated policies to persist. Here, we analyze nine reports published since the beginning of 2012 and consolidate over 250 suggestions into eight consensus recommendations made by the majority of the reports. We then propose how to implement these consensus recommendations, and we identify critical issues, such as improving workforce diversity and stakeholder interactions, on which the community has yet to achieve consensus.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/2621
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology
dc.source.pages10832-6


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
PNAS_2015_Pickett_10832_6.pdf
Size:
593.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record