Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHein, Irma M.
dc.contributor.authorTroost, Pieter W.
dc.contributor.authorLindeboom, Robert
dc.contributor.authorChristiaans, Imke
dc.contributor.authorGrisso, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorvan Goudoever, Johannes B.
dc.contributor.authorLindauer, Ramon J.L.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:44.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:41:17Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:41:17Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-01
dc.date.submitted2015-12-23
dc.identifier.citationJ Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):971-7. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9835-7. Epub 2015 Apr 26. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9835-7">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1059-7700 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10897-015-9835-7
dc.identifier.pmid25911621
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/39853
dc.description.abstractKnowledge on children's capacities to consent to medical treatment is limited. Also, age limits for asking children's consent vary considerably between countries. Decision-making on predictive genetic testing (PGT) is especially complicated, considering the ongoing ethical debate. In order to examine just age limits for alleged competence to consent in children, we evaluated feasibility of a standardized assessment tool, and investigated cutoff ages for children's competence to consent to PGT. We performed a pilot study, including 17 pediatric outpatients between 6 and 18 years at risk for an autosomal dominantly inherited cardiac disease, eligible for predictive genetic testing. The reference standard for competence was established by experts trained in the relevant criteria for competent decision-making. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) served as index test. Data analysis included raw agreement between competence classifications, difference in mean ages between children judged competent and judged incompetent, and estimation of cutoff ages for judgments of competence. Twelve (71 %) children were considered competent by the reference standard, and 16 (94 %) by the MacCAT-T, with an overall agreement of 76 %. The expert judgments disagreed in most cases, while the MacCAT-T judgments agreed in 65 %. Mean age of children judged incompetent was 9.3 years and of children judged competent 12.1 years (p = .035). With 90 % sensitivity, children younger than 10.0 years were judged incompetent, with 90 % specificity children older than 11.8 years were judged competent. Feasibility of the MacCAT-T in children is confirmed. Initial findings on age cutoffs are indicative for children between the age of 12 and 18 to be judged competent for involvement in the informed consent process. Future research on appropriate age-limits for children's alleged competence to consent is needed.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=25911621&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2015. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectDecision-making
dc.subjectGenetic testing
dc.subjectInformed consent
dc.subjectMental competence
dc.subjectMinors
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectBioethics and Medical Ethics
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectJuvenile Law
dc.subjectLaw and Psychology
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleFeasibility of an Assessment Tool for Children's Competence to Consent to Predictive Genetic Testing: a Pilot Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of genetic counseling
dc.source.volume24
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3655&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/2651
dc.identifier.contextkey7972033
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:41:17Z
html.description.abstract<p>Knowledge on children's capacities to consent to medical treatment is limited. Also, age limits for asking children's consent vary considerably between countries. Decision-making on predictive genetic testing (PGT) is especially complicated, considering the ongoing ethical debate. In order to examine just age limits for alleged competence to consent in children, we evaluated feasibility of a standardized assessment tool, and investigated cutoff ages for children's competence to consent to PGT. We performed a pilot study, including 17 pediatric outpatients between 6 and 18 years at risk for an autosomal dominantly inherited cardiac disease, eligible for predictive genetic testing. The reference standard for competence was established by experts trained in the relevant criteria for competent decision-making. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) served as index test. Data analysis included raw agreement between competence classifications, difference in mean ages between children judged competent and judged incompetent, and estimation of cutoff ages for judgments of competence. Twelve (71 %) children were considered competent by the reference standard, and 16 (94 %) by the MacCAT-T, with an overall agreement of 76 %. The expert judgments disagreed in most cases, while the MacCAT-T judgments agreed in 65 %. Mean age of children judged incompetent was 9.3 years and of children judged competent 12.1 years (p = .035). With 90 % sensitivity, children younger than 10.0 years were judged incompetent, with 90 % specificity children older than 11.8 years were judged competent. Feasibility of the MacCAT-T in children is confirmed. Initial findings on age cutoffs are indicative for children between the age of 12 and 18 to be judged competent for involvement in the informed consent process. Future research on appropriate age-limits for children's alleged competence to consent is needed.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/2651
dc.contributor.departmentSystems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry
dc.source.pages971-7


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
art_3A10.1007_2Fs10897_015_983 ...
Size:
155.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © The Author(s) 2015. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s) 2015. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.