Cross-Sectional Associations of Computed Tomography (CT)-Derived Adipose Tissue Density and Adipokines: The Framingham Heart Study
Authors
Lee, Jane J.Pedley, Alison
Hoffmann, Udo
Massaro, Joseph
Keaney, John F. Jr.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Fox, Caroline S.
UMass Chan Affiliations
UMass Metabolic NetworkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2016-02-29Keywords
adipokineadipose tissue
computed tomography
epidemiology
Biochemical Phenomena, Metabolism, and Nutrition
Cardiology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Medical Physiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Excess accumulation of abdominal subcutaneous (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with adverse levels of adipokines and cardiovascular disease risk. Whether fat quality is associated with adipokines has not been firmly established. This study examined the association between abdominal SAT and VAT density, an indirect measure of fat quality, with a panel of metabolic regulatory biomarkers secreted by adipose tissue or the liver independently of absolute fat volumes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 1829 Framingham Heart Study participants (44.9% women). Abdominal SAT and VAT density was estimated indirectly by adipose tissue attenuation using computed tomography. Adipokines included adiponectin, leptin receptor, leptin, fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP-4), retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP-4), and fetuin-A. Fat density was associated with all the biomarkers evaluated, except fetuin-A. Lower fat density (ie, more-negative fat attenuation) was associated with lower adiponectin and leptin receptor, but higher leptin and FABP-4 levels (all P < 0.0001). SAT density was inversely associated with RPB-4 in both sexes, whereas the association between VAT density and RPB-4 was only observed in men (P < 0.0001). In women, after additional adjustment for respective fat volume, SAT density retained the significant associations with adiponectin, leptin, FABP-4, and RBP-4; and VAT density with adiponectin only (all P<0.0001). In men, significant associations were maintained upon additional adjustment for respective fat volume (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Lower abdominal fat density was associated with a profile of biomarkers suggestive of greater cardiometabolic risk. These observations support that fat density may be a valid biomarker of cardiometabolic risk.Source
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 29;4(3):e002545. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002545. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1161/JAHA.115.002545Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/39935PubMed ID
26927600Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedRights
Copyright 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/JAHA.115.002545
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

