Adipose Tissue Depots and Their Cross-Sectional Associations With Circulating Biomarkers of Metabolic Regulation
Authors
Lee, Jane J.Britton, Kathryn A.
Pedley, Alison
Massaro, Joseph
Speliotes, Elizabeth K.
Murabito, Joanne M.
Hoffmann, Udo
Ingram, Cheryl
Keaney, John F.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Fox, Caroline S.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular MedicineDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2016-05-04
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and fatty liver differ in their associations with cardiovascular risk compared with subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Several biomarkers have been linked to metabolic derangements and may contribute to the pathogenicity of fat depots. We examined the association between fat depots on multidetector computed tomography and metabolic regulatory biomarkers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants from the Framingham Heart Study (n=1583, 47% women) underwent assessment of SAT, VAT, and liver attenuation. We measured circulating biomarkers secreted by adipose tissue or liver (adiponectin, leptin, leptin receptor, fatty acid binding protein 4, fetuin-A, and retinol binding protein 4). Using multivariable linear regression models, we examined relations of fat depots with biomarkers. Higher levels of fat depots were positively associated with leptin and fatty acid binding protein 4 but negatively associated with adiponectin (all P < 0.001). Associations with leptin receptor, fetuin-A, and retinol binding protein 4 varied according to fat depot type or sex. When comparing the associations of SAT and VAT with biomarkers, VAT was the stronger correlate of adiponectin (beta=-0.28 [women]; beta=-0.30 [men]; both P < 0.001), whereas SAT was the stronger correlate of leptin (beta=0.62 [women]; beta=0.49 [men]; both P < 0.001; P < 0.001 for comparing VAT versus SAT). Although fetuin-A and retinol binding protein 4 are secreted by the liver in addition to adipose tissue, associations of liver attenuation with these biomarkers was not stronger than that of SAT or VAT. CONCLUSIONS: SAT, VAT, and liver attenuation are associated with metabolic regulatory biomarkers with differences in the associations by fat depot type and sex. These findings support the possibility of biological differences between fat depots.Source
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 4;5(5). pii: e002936. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002936. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1161/JAHA.115.002936Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40036PubMed ID
27146446Related Resources
Rights
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/JAHA.115.002936
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.