UMass Chan AffiliationsUMass Metabolic Network
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
Document TypeJournal Article
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIn this review, we focused on common sources of confusion and errors in the analysis and interpretation of basic science studies. The issues addressed are seen repeatedly in the authors' editorial experience, and we hope this article will serve as a guide for those who may submit their basic science studies to journals that publish both clinical and basic science research. We have discussed issues related to sample size and power, study design, data analysis, and presentation of results. We then illustrated these issues using a set of examples from basic science research studies.
SourceJ Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Sep 29;5(10). pii: e004142. Link to article on publisher's site
Permanent Link to this Itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40143
Related ResourcesLink to Article in PubMed
Rights© 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.