Culturally adaptive storytelling intervention versus didactic intervention to improve hypertension control in Vietnam: a cluster-randomized controlled feasibility trial
Authors
Nguyen, Hoa LAllison, Jeroan J.
Ha, Duc A.
Chiriboga, German
Ly, Ha N.
Tran, Hanh T.
Nguyen, Cuong K.
Dang, Diem M.
Phan, Ngoc T.
Vu, Nguyen C.
Nguyen, Quang P.
Goldberg, Robert J.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2017-05-01Keywords
Blood pressureHypertension
Storytelling
Trial
Vietnam
Cardiology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Clinical Epidemiology
Community Health and Preventive Medicine
Epidemiology
International Public Health
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Vietnam is experiencing an epidemiologic transition with an increased prevalence of non-communicable diseases. Novel, large-scale, effective, and sustainable interventions to control hypertension in Vietnam are needed. We report the results of a cluster-randomized feasibility trial at 3 months follow-up conducted in Hung Yen province, Vietnam, designed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of two community-based interventions to improve hypertension control: a "storytelling" intervention, "We Talk about Our Hypertension," and a didactic intervention. METHODS: The storytelling intervention included stories about strategies for coping with hypertension, with patients speaking in their own words, and didactic content about the importance of healthy lifestyle behaviors including salt reduction and exercise. The didactic intervention included only didactic content. The storytelling intervention was delivered by two DVDs at 3-month intervals; the didactic intervention included only one installment. The trial was conducted in four communes, equally randomized to the two interventions. RESULTS: The mean age of the 160 study patients was 66 years, and 54% were men. Most participants described both interventions as understandable, informative, and motivational. Between baseline and 3 months, mean systolic blood pressure declined by 8.2 mmHg (95% CI 4.1-12.2) in the storytelling group and by 5.5 mmHg (95% CI 1.4-9.5) in the didactic group. The storytelling group also reported a significant increase in hypertension medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions were well accepted in several rural communities and were shown to be potentially effective in lowering blood pressure. A large-scale randomized trial is needed to compare the effectiveness of the two interventions in controlling hypertension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02483780.Source
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 May 1;3:22. eCollection 2017. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1186/s40814-017-0136-9Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40248PubMed ID
28473924Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedRights
Copyright © The Author(s). 2017.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s40814-017-0136-9