We are upgrading the repository! The content freeze has been extended to December 11, 2024, when we expect the new repository to become available. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed until after the new website goes live. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChinman, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorMcInnes, D. Keith.
dc.contributor.authorEisen, Susan
dc.contributor.authorEllison, Marsha Langer
dc.contributor.authorFarkas, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Moe
dc.contributor.authorResnick, Sandra G.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:47.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:43:46Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:43:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-01
dc.date.submitted2017-11-01
dc.identifier.citationPsychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):955-957. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700054. Epub 2017 Jun 15. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700054">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1075-2730 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1176/appi.ps.201700054
dc.identifier.pmid28617205
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40366
dc.description.abstractMental health peer specialists are individuals with serious mental illnesses who receive training to use their lived experiences to help others with serious mental illnesses in clinical settings. This Open Forum discusses the state of the research for mental health peer specialists and suggests a research agenda to advance the field. Studies have suggested that peer specialists vary widely in their roles, settings, and theoretical orientations. Theories of action have been proposed, but none have been tested. Outcome studies have shown benefits of peer specialists; however, many studies have methodological shortcomings. Qualitative descriptions of peer specialists are plentiful but lack grounding in implementation science frameworks. A research agenda advancing the field could include empirically testing theoretical mechanisms of peer specialists, developing a measure of peer specialist fidelity, conducting more rigorous outcomes studies, involving peer specialists in executing the research, and assessing various factors that influence implementing peer specialist services and testing strategies that could address those factors.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=28617205&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5638298/
dc.subjectpeer support
dc.subjectpeer specialists
dc.subjectmental health
dc.subjectMental and Social Health
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleEstablishing a Research Agenda for Understanding the Role and Impact of Mental Health Peer Specialists
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)
dc.source.volume68
dc.source.issue9
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/3164
dc.identifier.contextkey10981243
html.description.abstract<p>Mental health peer specialists are individuals with serious mental illnesses who receive training to use their lived experiences to help others with serious mental illnesses in clinical settings. This Open Forum discusses the state of the research for mental health peer specialists and suggests a research agenda to advance the field. Studies have suggested that peer specialists vary widely in their roles, settings, and theoretical orientations. Theories of action have been proposed, but none have been tested. Outcome studies have shown benefits of peer specialists; however, many studies have methodological shortcomings. Qualitative descriptions of peer specialists are plentiful but lack grounding in implementation science frameworks. A research agenda advancing the field could include empirically testing theoretical mechanisms of peer specialists, developing a measure of peer specialist fidelity, conducting more rigorous outcomes studies, involving peer specialists in executing the research, and assessing various factors that influence implementing peer specialist services and testing strategies that could address those factors.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/3164
dc.contributor.departmentSystems and Psychosocial Advances Research Center
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry
dc.source.pages955-957


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record