Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLujan-Hernandez, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorAppasani, Raghu
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Kylee
dc.contributor.authorSiegel-Reamer, Leah
dc.contributor.authorLalikos, Janice F.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:48.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:44:09Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:44:09Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-15
dc.date.submitted2018-02-01
dc.identifier.citation<p>Arch Plast Surg. 2017 Sep;44(5):361-369. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.5.361. Epub 2017 Sep 15. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.5.361">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2234-6163 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.5999/aps.2017.44.5.361
dc.identifier.pmid28946716
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40446
dc.description.abstractAs the popularity of fat grafting research increases, animal models are being used as the source of pre-clinical experimental information for discovery and to enhance techniques. To date, animal models used in this research have not been compared to provide a standardized model. We analyzed publications from 1968-2015 to compare published accounts of animal models in fat grafting research. Data collected included: species used, graft characteristics (donor tissue, recipient area, amount injected, injection technique), time of sacrifice and quantification methods. Mice were most commonly used (56% of studies), with the "athymic nude" strain utilized most frequently (44%). Autologous fat was the most common source of grafted tissue (52%). Subcutaneous dorsum was the most common recipient site (51%). On average, 0.80+/-0.60 mL of fat was grafted. A single bolus technique was used in 57% of studies. Fat volume assessment was typically completed at the end of the study, occurring at less than 1 week to one year. Graft volume was quantified by weight (63%), usually in conjunction with another analysis. The results demonstrate the current heterogeneity of animal models in this research. We propose that the research community reach a consensus to allow better comparison of techniques and results. One example is the model used in our laboratory and others; this model is described in detail. Eventually, larger animal models may better translate to the human condition but, given increased financial costs and animal facility capability, should be explored when data obtained from small animal studies is exhausted or inconclusive.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=28946716&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright © 2017 Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectAdipose tissue
dc.subjectFat grafting
dc.subjectModels
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectResearch
dc.subjectResearch design
dc.subjectAnimal Experimentation and Research
dc.subjectLaboratory and Basic Science Research
dc.subjectPlastic Surgery
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleExperimental In-Vivo Models Used in Fat Grafting Research for Volume Augmentation in Soft Tissue Reconstruction
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleArchives of plastic surgery
dc.source.volume44
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4260&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/3250
dc.identifier.contextkey11461553
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:44:09Z
html.description.abstract<p>As the popularity of fat grafting research increases, animal models are being used as the source of pre-clinical experimental information for discovery and to enhance techniques. To date, animal models used in this research have not been compared to provide a standardized model. We analyzed publications from 1968-2015 to compare published accounts of animal models in fat grafting research. Data collected included: species used, graft characteristics (donor tissue, recipient area, amount injected, injection technique), time of sacrifice and quantification methods. Mice were most commonly used (56% of studies), with the "athymic nude" strain utilized most frequently (44%). Autologous fat was the most common source of grafted tissue (52%). Subcutaneous dorsum was the most common recipient site (51%). On average, 0.80+/-0.60 mL of fat was grafted. A single bolus technique was used in 57% of studies. Fat volume assessment was typically completed at the end of the study, occurring at less than 1 week to one year. Graft volume was quantified by weight (63%), usually in conjunction with another analysis. The results demonstrate the current heterogeneity of animal models in this research. We propose that the research community reach a consensus to allow better comparison of techniques and results. One example is the model used in our laboratory and others; this model is described in detail. Eventually, larger animal models may better translate to the human condition but, given increased financial costs and animal facility capability, should be explored when data obtained from small animal studies is exhausted or inconclusive.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/3250
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery
dc.source.pages361-369


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
aps_2017_44_5_361.pdf
Size:
1.706Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © 2017 Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2017 Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.