Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKlenowski, Paul M.
dc.contributor.authorWright, Sophie E.
dc.contributor.authorMu, Erica W. H.
dc.contributor.authorNoakes, Peter G.
dc.contributor.authorLavidis, Nickolas A.
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, Selena E.
dc.contributor.authorBellingham, Mark C.
dc.contributor.authorFogarty, Matthew J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:49.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:44:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:44:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-19
dc.date.submitted2018-03-29
dc.identifier.citation<p>Brain Sci. 2017 Dec 19;7(12). pii: brainsci7120165. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7120165. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7120165">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2076-3425 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/brainsci7120165
dc.identifier.pmid29257086
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40522
dc.description.abstractQuantitative assessments of neuronal subtypes in numerous brain regions show large variations in dendritic arbor size. A critical experimental factor is the method used to visualize neurons. We chose to investigate quantitative differences in basolateral amygdala (BLA) principal neuron morphology using two of the most common visualization methods: Golgi-Cox staining and neurobiotin (NB) filling. We show in 8-week-old Wistar rats that NB-filling reveals significantly larger dendritic arbors and different spine densities, compared to Golgi-Cox-stained BLA neurons. Our results demonstrate important differences and provide methodological insights into quantitative disparities of BLA principal neuron morphology reported in the literature.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=29257086&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rights© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectGolgi–Cox
dc.subjectbasolateral amygdala
dc.subjectdendrites
dc.subjectneurobiotin
dc.subjectprincipal neuron
dc.subjectspines
dc.subjectNeuroscience and Neurobiology
dc.titleInvestigating Methodological Differences in the Assessment of Dendritic Morphology of Basolateral Amygdala Principal Neurons-A Comparison of Golgi-Cox and Neurobiotin Electroporation Techniques
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleBrain sciences
dc.source.volume7
dc.source.issue12
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4335&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/3324
dc.identifier.contextkey11871278
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:44:33Z
html.description.abstract<p>Quantitative assessments of neuronal subtypes in numerous brain regions show large variations in dendritic arbor size. A critical experimental factor is the method used to visualize neurons. We chose to investigate quantitative differences in basolateral amygdala (BLA) principal neuron morphology using two of the most common visualization methods: Golgi-Cox staining and neurobiotin (NB) filling. We show in 8-week-old Wistar rats that NB-filling reveals significantly larger dendritic arbors and different spine densities, compared to Golgi-Cox-stained BLA neurons. Our results demonstrate important differences and provide methodological insights into quantitative disparities of BLA principal neuron morphology reported in the literature.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/3324
dc.contributor.departmentNeurobiology


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
brainsci_07_00165.pdf
Size:
2.202Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).