Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorInguva, Venkatesh
dc.contributor.authorKathuria, Sagar V.
dc.contributor.authorBilsel, Osman
dc.contributor.authorPerot, Blair James
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:50.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:45:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:45:33Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-20
dc.date.submitted2018-08-08
dc.identifier.citation<p>PLoS One. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0198534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198534. eCollection 2018. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198534">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0198534
dc.identifier.pmid29924842
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40703
dc.description.abstractKinetic studies of biological macromolecules increasingly use microfluidic mixers to initiate and monitor reaction progress. A motivation for using microfluidic mixers is to reduce sample consumption and decrease mixing time to microseconds. Some applications, such as small-angle x-ray scattering, also require large ( > 10 micron) sampling areas to ensure high signal-to-noise ratios and to minimize parasitic scattering. Chaotic to marginally turbulent mixers are well suited for these applications because this class of mixers provides a good middle ground between existing laminar and turbulent mixers. In this study, we model various chaotic to marginally turbulent mixing concepts such as flow turning, flow splitting, and vortex generation using computational fluid dynamics for optimization of mixing efficiency and observation volume. Design iterations show flow turning to be the best candidate for chaotic/marginally turbulent mixing. A qualitative experimental test is performed on the finalized design with mixing of 10 M urea and water to validate the flow turning unsteady mixing concept as a viable option for RNA and protein folding studies. A comparison of direct numerical simulations (DNS) and turbulence models suggests that the applicability of turbulence models to these flow regimes may be limited.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=29924842&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2018 Inguva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectTurbulence
dc.subjectUrea
dc.subjectViscosity
dc.subjectFluid flow
dc.subjectSignal processing
dc.subjectFluids
dc.subjectFluid dynamics
dc.subjectSimulation and modeling
dc.subjectAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Biophysics, and Structural Biology
dc.subjectComputational Engineering
dc.subjectFluid Dynamics
dc.subjectNucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides
dc.titleComputer design of microfluidic mixers for protein/RNA folding studies
dc.typeArticle
dc.source.journaltitlePloS one
dc.source.volume13
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4517&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/3506
dc.identifier.contextkey12624486
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:45:33Z
html.description.abstract<p>Kinetic studies of biological macromolecules increasingly use microfluidic mixers to initiate and monitor reaction progress. A motivation for using microfluidic mixers is to reduce sample consumption and decrease mixing time to microseconds. Some applications, such as small-angle x-ray scattering, also require large ( > 10 micron) sampling areas to ensure high signal-to-noise ratios and to minimize parasitic scattering. Chaotic to marginally turbulent mixers are well suited for these applications because this class of mixers provides a good middle ground between existing laminar and turbulent mixers. In this study, we model various chaotic to marginally turbulent mixing concepts such as flow turning, flow splitting, and vortex generation using computational fluid dynamics for optimization of mixing efficiency and observation volume. Design iterations show flow turning to be the best candidate for chaotic/marginally turbulent mixing. A qualitative experimental test is performed on the finalized design with mixing of 10 M urea and water to validate the flow turning unsteady mixing concept as a viable option for RNA and protein folding studies. A comparison of direct numerical simulations (DNS) and turbulence models suggests that the applicability of turbulence models to these flow regimes may be limited.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/3506
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology
dc.source.pagese0198534


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
journal.pone.0198534.pdf
Size:
17.29Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright: © 2018 Inguva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright: © 2018 Inguva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.