Therapeutic benefit of apremilast on enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis of the PALACE 1-3 studies
Authors
Gladman, Dafna D.Kavanaugh, Arthur
Gomez-Reino, Juan J.
Wollenhaupt, Jurgen
Cutolo, Maurizio
Schett, Georg
Lespessailles, Eric
Guerette, Benoit
Delev, Nikolay
Teng, Lichen
Edwards, Christopher J.
Birbara, Charles
Mease, Philip J.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2018-06-27Keywords
anti-rheumatic agentsapremilast
arthritis
phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors
psoriatic
Clinical Trials
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Rheumatology
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
Therapeutics
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective: The Psoriatic Arthritis Long-term Assessment of Clinical Efficacy (PALACE) clinical trial programme findings demonstrated that apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, is effective for treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Enthesitis and dactylitis are difficult-to-treat features of PsA leading to disability and affecting quality of life. PALACE 1, 2 and 3 data were pooled to assess the efficacy of apremilast on enthesitis and dactylitis outcomes in patients with these conditions at baseline. Methods: Patients with enthesitis (n=945) or dactylitis (n=633) at baseline were analysed after receiving double-blind treatment with placebo, apremilast 30 mg two times per day or apremilast 20 mg two times per day up to 52 weeks and continuing up to 5 years. Data were analysed through 156 weeks. Enthesitis was evaluated by Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) and dactylitis via dactylitis count. Results: At week 24, patients receiving apremilast 30 mg two times per day demonstrated a significantly greater mean change in enthesitis (-1.3 vs -0.9; p < 0.05) and dactylitis (-1.8 vs -1.3; p < 0.01) vs placebo. Patients in the 30 mg dose group showed significantly greater mean (-23.6% vs -7.0%; p < 0.05) and median (-50.0% vs -21.1%; p < 0.05) per cent changes in MASES; mean and median per cent changes in dactylitis count were numerically, but not significantly, different for either apremilast dose in patients with dactylitis. In the patient population remaining on apremilast, observed mean and median improvements in both conditions were sustained through 156 weeks. Conclusion: Apremilast is effective for the treatment of active PsA, including improvements in enthesitis and dactylitis up to 3 years. Trial registration numbers: NCT01172938, NCT01212757 and NCT01212770.Source
RMD Open. 2018 Jun 27;4(1):e000669. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000669. eCollection 2018. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000669Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40718PubMed ID
30018799Related Resources
Rights
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. Open access: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000669
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. Open access: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

