Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThompson-Lastad, Ariana
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, Paula
dc.contributor.authorChao, Maria T.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:52.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:46:40Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:46:40Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-25
dc.date.submitted2019-03-12
dc.identifier.citation<p>Health Equity. 2019 Jan 25;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.1089/heq.2018.0081. eCollection 2019. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2018.0081">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2473-1242 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/heq.2018.0081
dc.identifier.pmid30706043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/40927
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Integrative group medical visits (IGMVs) aim to increase access to complementary and integrative health care, which is particularly relevant for low-income people. We sought to describe IGMV programs in US safety-net clinics through a survey of providers. Methods: An online and paper survey was conducted to collect data on the use of complementary health approaches and characteristics of IGMV programs. We recruited a purposive sample of safety-net clinicians via national meetings and listservs. Results: Fifty-seven clinicians reported on group medical visits. Forty percent worked in federally qualified health centers, 57% in safety-net or teaching hospitals, 23% in other settings such as free clinics. Thirty-seven respondents in 11 states provided care in IGMVs, most commonly for chronic pain and diabetes. Nutrition (70%), mindfulness/meditation/breathing (59%), and tai chi/yoga/other movement practices (51%) were the most common treatment approaches in IGMVs. Conclusion: Safety-net institutions in 11 states offered IGMVs to treat a range of chronic conditions. IGMVs are an innovative model to improve access to non-pharmacologic approaches to chronic illness care and health promotion. They may advance health equity by serving patients negatively impacted by health and health care disparities.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=30706043&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright Ariana Thompson-Lastad et al. 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectchronic disease
dc.subjectcommunity health centers
dc.subjectintegrative medicine
dc.subjectsafety-net providers
dc.subjectAlternative and Complementary Medicine
dc.subjectCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectIntegrative Medicine
dc.subjectMovement and Mind-Body Therapies
dc.titleIntegrative Group Medical Visits: A National Scoping Survey of Safety-Net Clinics
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleHealth equity
dc.source.volume3
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4740&amp;context=oapubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/oapubs/3726
dc.identifier.contextkey14008321
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:46:40Z
html.description.abstract<p>Purpose: Integrative group medical visits (IGMVs) aim to increase access to complementary and integrative health care, which is particularly relevant for low-income people. We sought to describe IGMV programs in US safety-net clinics through a survey of providers.</p> <p>Methods: An online and paper survey was conducted to collect data on the use of complementary health approaches and characteristics of IGMV programs. We recruited a purposive sample of safety-net clinicians via national meetings and listservs.</p> <p>Results: Fifty-seven clinicians reported on group medical visits. Forty percent worked in federally qualified health centers, 57% in safety-net or teaching hospitals, 23% in other settings such as free clinics. Thirty-seven respondents in 11 states provided care in IGMVs, most commonly for chronic pain and diabetes. Nutrition (70%), mindfulness/meditation/breathing (59%), and tai chi/yoga/other movement practices (51%) were the most common treatment approaches in IGMVs.</p> <p>Conclusion: Safety-net institutions in 11 states offered IGMVs to treat a range of chronic conditions. IGMVs are an innovative model to improve access to non-pharmacologic approaches to chronic illness care and health promotion. They may advance health equity by serving patients negatively impacted by health and health care disparities.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathoapubs/3726
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Integrated Primary Care
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine
dc.source.pages1-8


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
heq.2018.0081.pdf
Size:
665.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright Ariana Thompson-Lastad et al. 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright Ariana Thompson-Lastad et al. 2018; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.