Becoming Doctors: Examining Student Narratives to Understand the Process of Professional Identity Formation Within a Learning Community
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2019-03-26Keywords
Professional identity formationmedical education
medical students
professional development
Medical Education
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Professional identity formation is a key aim of medical education, yet empiric data on how this forms are limited. Methods: Our study is a qualitative analysis of student reflections written during the final session of our Becoming a Physician curriculum. After reading their medical school admission essay and their class oath, students wrote about a "time, or times during your third year when you felt like a doctor." The reflections were qualitatively analyzed by the evaluation team, looking for themes found in the reflections. Results: Narrative themes separated into 4 distinct categories, specifically that performing physician tasks can make one feel like a doctor, demonstrating caring is a fundamental task of doctors, integrating personal ideals with professional values promotes professional identity formation, and the theme of never feeling like a doctor. Subsets of these broad categories provide further insight into individual and integrative tasks. Patients, patient families, and students through their own reflection prompted learners to feel like doctors in 74% of narratives, whereas physicians or the care team did so in 26% of our narratives. Conclusion: Students are able to reflect on times during their principal clinical year where they feel like doctors, taking a step toward forming a professional identity. Having faculty prompt and support such reflection can help faculty understand the student experience of their principal clinical year and promote professional identity formation.Source
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019 Mar 26;6:2382120519834546. doi: 10.1177/2382120519834546. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1177/2382120519834546Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/41001PubMed ID
30937388Related Resources
Rights
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1177/2382120519834546
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).